That's *got* to be a spoof.

LOL... "This message was brought to you by the ABPI/NIH*, in association with the MHRA/FDA*"!

* delete as appropriate

Lol ROFL now. I'm expecting the low-voiced rapidly speaking woman chime in with the disclaimer now.

Disclaimer: This highlighted comment was not intended for the purposes of furthering education and research into the genetic predisposition related to Scientology finger pointing by NAMI leaning individuals. Though this ad could be construed as a unpaid advertisement for the Pharmaceutical industry and the deceased based a hypothesis that all emotional conflict related to the human condition are inherently rampaging out of control biochemical diseases of the brain. This verminous toxic verbiage does not preclude that cat poop was a direct cause and viral pandemic of catastrophic proportion that should be addressed somewhere or at least laughed at by the WHO. The writer and/or writers; including those encouraging such ignoramus conclusions leaves the option of pleading drug side effect relationship to all stated opinions open until large voltage ECT can be arranged at the expense of those profiteering from stated scientific theology. Further more, this was not intended to be used for commercial purposes or for careers advancement or aggrandizement of any stated individuals including Dr. J. Biederbutt, Or Dr. Nimmernutts. Though Emory and Harvard University related medical facilities were not mentioned in this comment; this does not mean they were left out intentionally or added to this disclaimer for purely satirical purposes. Those sitting on the floor laughing at this comment will not have any legal or intended biding legal obligation from the aforementioned Commenter for any side splitting injury arising from the stupidity of the morose modality defending panderer. All opinion stated or not stated here were purely used as a base line for an array of new the DSM-V personally disorder criteria; and will not be copy-written until proper individuals have published their own comic-book version of this material and bribed those with the power to lend professional credence to the fantasy.

I don't believe this "comment" for one minute. It is someone having a little fun and getting a dig in at Scientologists - all in one fell swoop.

No physician would put a child on eight medications. That is malpractice.

Oh please let that be sarcasm. If it's real, I really feel for that child.

I think Francesca might be on to something. Doesn't that have spoof written all over it? Otherwise it's one of Michael Schofield's cronies trying to get one back. Crazy!

"They're all FDA approved drugs anyway."

THAT is the problem with parents and doctors who have no current knowledge regarding the FDA and conflict of interest, and fast tracking of dangerous medications such as the new approval of Saphris, which was deemed not safe for approval one year before the recent approval.

If the "weirdest comment" ever author were to read fine print about all psych meds they will come to their own conclusion without the help of a psychopharmacologist.

If only this was a joke. Unfortunately Zyprexa and Seroquel lawsuits abound, the internal documents are proof enough that the company was taking a chance to make money off of children by marketing off-label use as well as covering up the diabetes and weight gain issues.

After a young child has been drugged from approximately age 7- 17, only then will time show the bodily damage done. Permanent damage.

For that reader, I would recommend watching PBS (online for free)Medicated Child and watch some of those kids shake and tremor, and that is forever damage.

I stopped at the first "scientology/anti-psychiatrist".
Can't take it any longer.

I am not going to make a direct accusation, or say this person is or related to "Marcie Lipsitt".

But if you read back in the FS comment section archives. They sound disturbing similar, while touting the same mirror ideology.

I believe it should be pointed out that as absurd as this featured comment may appear on the surface. This is fairly standard rhetoric out of the BPKids organization where Harvard's Dr. J. Biederman is on the advisory board.

http://www.furiousseasons.com/archives/2009/02/biederman_defended_by_families_some_patients.html

Ok, obviously this whole think was tongue-in-cheek, and to pick up where Observer started yes, I actually did rip some of the language from the bpdkids website and it was in fact, that website, which I peroused last night that inspired this comment.

And subtle sarcasm not withstanding, it is pretty much the standard line of a lot of the childbpd'ers -- which is insane. Unfortunately it was also sort of the mindset of people in my family when I was younger. Iv'e commented a lot about that here. I sort of feel like I can dance in those shoes well so to speak -- owing to my experience.

At anyrate, if anyone got the tonque-in-cheek format and I made you laugh that was my real intention. Im trying to not be so bitter about these criminals. And it was also my intention to make it sound as robotic and as like an advertising tag line as I could.

Anyway, sorry Philip if you were questioning the veracity of it, but I think we can agree its not completely out of bounds for the Biederman apologists et al.

I vote that it is a spoof of Marcie Lipsitt. She, however, is the real deal.

I've looked into this Marcie Lipsitt lady who I had not known about before, but coming from a family where my mother *enjoyed* bringing me into the grand holy MGH for endless appointments with "experts" (because of the effects of massive polypharmacy), I can say with some confidence that this lady has FULL-BLOWN Manchausen's Syndrome by Proxy. Like full-blown. Her half intelligible writings outline the picture of a woman with poor to horrific boundaries and who's child is unfortunately, as she herself says, "the center" of "her universe".

If she couldn't play the role of heroic mother what else would she do? That lady is a nucking fut and her child deserves boundaries and a life of his own.

Thats my piece.

Sort of Poe-like. No?

I think JC is a satirist of Swiftian proportions. Well done, JC, and thanks for the laughs.

I agree that this is a spoof. No one could have these sentiments. I think the EIGHT medications is a dead give away.

"They're all FDA approved drugs anyway."

Anonymous,
Did he/she say that?
Yes! I laugh a lot when people use this argument. The problem is that people trust FDA.
They are not informed that FDA is part of the consortium and don't give a damn for health.
Sad.

It is a spoof. But are you being tongue-in-cheek too Tom? The eight meds part is from my life's story! lol

JC, you're good!

"It is a spoof. But are you being tongue-in-cheek too Tom? The eight meds part is from my life's story! lol"

Yeah, there's where the Modest Proposal comparisons fall through-- no one ever tried to eat Jonathan Smith.

*Swift

"Every Sha-la-la-la
Every Wo-wo-wo
Still shines
Every shing-a-ling-a-ling
That they're starting to sing's
So fine"

This comment is for the contest "Weirdest Comment Ever On This Site".