September 18, 2009

Well, There's One Good Thing In The Senate Health Care Reform Bill

I've been wrestling with how to say something sensible about the Senate Finance Committee's health care reform bill, but what can you say when the country is literally ripping itself apart over the shape of the reforms and an unexpected side show has broken out over race and the contention that opposition to reform--and to President Barack Obama himself--is racially-motivated? There's damn little that's safe to say in that environment, especially when I myself have been a victim of racial discrimination (at UC Berkeley no less and at the hands of the New York Times and other media companies) and had that limit my career opportunities, my future earning potential and, yes, my dreams. I ain't making that up, but I'm not getting into it today.

It's not clear to me whether or not the Senate Dems have got the votes to get the bill approved and the whole thing is so big and complex that I'm not sure if it should be approved in its present form. But the bill authored by Sen. Max Baucus (D-Montana) does have one provision in it that I support 100 percent and that's the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which is embedded in the bill. The Act has floated around the Senate for a few years and was authored by Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Herb Kohl (D-Wisc.). Simply put, it would require drug and device makers to report to the feds any payment or gift to a doctor or researcher of $10 or more or face a $1 million penalty. The reports would later become available to the public on the Internet.

Sounds good to me, although I wouldn't necessarily support the Baucus bill on the basis of its sunshine provision. I merely hope that whatever House or Senate bill eventually winds up being passed (assuming something can get passed in D.C.'s noxious environment) and heads to the President for his signature will contain the sunshine provision. I'm tired of waiting for the lawsuits to come out about Drug X or Y to find out about all the dough Harvard's Joseph Biederman was getting from Janssen/J&J and that Pfizer was paying for a psychiatrist's helicopter rides to go shill for Geodon and so on.

I expect we'll have some kind of answer on what health care reform will or won't look like by mid-October.

Posted by Philip Dawdy at September 18, 2009 12:03 AM
StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Digg it reddit
Comments

We need reforms. Lots of them. But I just don't believe in the package that is likely to emerge...too many otehr viable options. Along with this sunshine idea, another occurred to me: what if each encounter with medical treatment required that the patient acknowledge and initial each procedure to be "performed"/billed? This is a model in many other commercial areas where complicated billing will emerge out of a contract or an episode. For example, a pt. is admitted to psych hosp. Pt, or someone acting in parens patriae, would initial to accept / acknowledge the bill-stuffing sleep-deprived EEG, and the faux, limited efficacy group therapy delivered twice a day by some psych tech assigned to the unit for the day, dressed up as "goals group," and "wrap-up group," and other such labels, which is little more than an excuse to charge yet another $150 (CPT code 90853 for those who want to add this to their menu of unseen charges).

In other words, you learn what goes on that will generate charges at your visit.

Pair this up with: shift the tax benefit FROM the employer pre-tax bnefit idea, to a consumer's tax-deduction expense. If you pay $12,000 for health ins., you keep documentation, report this in your form 10-40, and drop your taxable income by 12,000. Thus, roughly guesstimating a tax rate of 25%, you get $12,000 of health coverage for $9,000.

Now, individuals are shopping as informed consumers, and insurers will be marketing to them, instead of plying the benefits managers of large employers.

Posted by: medsvstherapy at September 18, 2009 06:20 AM

I think the right-wing talk show hosts have been confusing the race issue brought up by Jimmy Carter and others including the NYT's Maureen Dowd. Where Carter et al (and I) see the racism is the totally irrational opposition to Obama in general that posits him as "other." The Birthers and so on.

Just FYI, I"m on the psychology chat list over at LinkedIn, and there's quite a discussion going about the health care bills, the role of government in our lives, and so on. Including therapists weighing in on how insurance co's handle their services now vs. possibly in the future.

Posted by: Miranda at September 18, 2009 07:17 AM

While I agree with what you're saying, MVT, there are all kinds of problems with a patient opting out of those useless goals groups. I found that out first hand. If a patient opts out of this, they're noncompliant with treatment and we all know what happens then.

When I told a nurse that I wasn't going to attend any more of the groups because I didn't have the finances to be paying to sit in a circle and listen to someone who is psychotic rant on and on, or pay to be asked questions like "if you were an animal in a circus..." she told me, too bad I would have to pay for it anyway. I did mention that it would be considered fraud if she put I attended a group and then charged my insurance company and myself for services never rendered. While that did shut her up, it lead to comments in my medical record like "noncompliant with treatment," "hostile toward staff," etc. It's a no win situation for the patient when it comes to psych treatment. You either do what they say in the pysch hospital or they will delay your release and write nasty comments in your medical record.

Posted by: Lisa at September 19, 2009 02:19 PM

Lisa,
You need to come to NH for your next psych sojourn. Not attending "group" is Reason #3 for getting tossed out of the nuthouse. I was puzzled by this until I got my bill and saw that my insurance company paid $45 a pop (in 1983) for the DAILY worse-than-useless "therapy" group. Not attending "group" would get you tossed out of the place with lightening speed. They didn't care about compliance--it was all about the money, honey. They had plenty of customers to fill your bed so out you go, gotta keep these people in line so no excused absences whatsoever.

Hey, mvt, have you been to that place? You description of the faux group therapy really cracked me up.

Posted by: Sherry at September 19, 2009 06:50 PM

My apologies, MVT, I misunderstood your post. After reading it again, I realize you do see problems with the opt in/opt out of treatment idea.

It is too bad, though, that the govt, insurance companies, and patients are being defrauded of so much money for the stuff that goes on in these psych facilities. My shrink agreed that the "goals groups" were worse than useless, but said the hospital has to have some way to keep patients occupied during the day. I guess it is a good way to bring in money, because they can pay the psych tech minimum wage, and bill the patient/government/insurance for "treatment." They sure don't like it when you don't go to those groups, and it's easy to see why.

Posted by: Lisa at September 19, 2009 09:31 PM

Sherry, if I had known that, I would have requested an immediate transfer to NH. Lol.

I should clarify I was polite about my request to skip "group" at first. When my shrink came by, I explained to him my concerns over the financial burden that was going to fall on my parents, me, and the insurance company for something that was not helpful and was making me feel even more stigmatized. He was in full agreement when we spoke in private. My shrink even told me, they would have had to drag him kicking and screaming to attend those "groups." He told me it would have felt demeaning to him, too, but that I had to understand that it's just about keeping us busy during the day. I suggested a movie instead. So, when the staff kept badgering and threatening me after I had permission from my psychiatrist not to attend, I got pissed. (This was a different hospitalization than the one where they dragged me by my arms for not leaving the cafeteria in a timely fashion).

In retrospect, my shrink was a big part of the problem. He said he supported my decisions not to attend group in private, but he was telling the staff I was too "astute" to attend group. What a jerk.

Another way they would keep "voluntary" patients inpatient is the nurses told us if we left AMA, then our health insurance wouldn't cover any of our stay and we would get stuck with a big bill. So much for being voluntary.

I finally did get wise to this insurance stuff. During my final hospitalization I had already decided that if they didn't release me AMA or otherwise, I was going to call and cancel my insurance coverage.


My hope is that if this universal health care coverage thing passes that it won't make it more difficult for people to get out of the psych ward once they're there. Many times it was my insurance company's refusal to pay more days that led to my freedom.

I also hope that the laws regarding hospitalizing people against their will do not become more stringent. Many in the system manipulate the current laws enough as it is.

Posted by: Lisa at September 20, 2009 01:17 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






pic1.jpg

Patient Blogs. Sites.
Doctor Blogs. Sites.
Activists. News.
Social Networking. Forums.
Science. Big Pharma. Ethics.
Current Affairs
Seattle Stuff
Smoking. Stuff.

Info
About Furious Seasons
Email
Other Articles
ZYPREXA Documents
Alt ZYPREXA Documents Source
Blakemore-Brown Transcript

 Subscribe in a reader

Search


Recent Entries
$99 Left
$114 To Go
Winter Fundraiser, $134 To Go, Final Day
Ruth Lilly, Eli Lilly Heiress, Prozac Beneficiary Dies At 94
Winter Fundraiser, Final Day, Less Than $200 To Go
UCLA Psychiatrist Criticizes DSM-5
Winter Fundraiser, Barely $200 To Go
Most Popular Posts Of 2009
Winter Fundraiser, Less Than $300 Left, Let's Wrap It Up
Senate Health Care Bill Contains $1.25 Billion Gift To Sen. Stabenow
Travel Day, Comment Approval May Be Intermittent
Winter Fundraiser, Close But Stalled
Senate Health Care Reform Bill Contains Controversial MOTHERS Act, Abortion Study
Adult ADHD And Sleep Problems
Vic Chesnutt Dead At 45, Possible Suicide
Recent Comments

Lisa on Well, There's One Good Thing In The Senate Health Care Reform Bill

Lisa on Well, There's One Good Thing In The Senate Health Care Reform Bill

Sherry on Well, There's One Good Thing In The Senate Health Care Reform Bill

Lisa on Well, There's One Good Thing In The Senate Health Care Reform Bill

Miranda on Well, There's One Good Thing In The Senate Health Care Reform Bill

medsvstherapy on Well, There's One Good Thing In The Senate Health Care Reform Bill

Archives
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
Resources
Mental Health America
National Alliance on Mental Illness
Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance
National Institute of Mental Health
McMan Web
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2