August 28, 2009Spikol Nails ItSeveral readers thought I was far too kind to ABC's "Primetime" program of Tuesday night on Mad Pride. Fair enough. I guess I was so staggered that we didn't have the usual major media completely screwing up a mental health story situation that I lost control of my critical faculties. Fortunately, Liz Spikol live-blogged the show the other night and brilliantly so. Here, she picks things up when the show spins away from dealing with Mad Pride, the stated purpose of the program, and plays the violence card: "'But critics worry …' That’s journalism-speak for 'We don’t have any specific sources who say this, but we’ll generalize it so we have reason to focus on …' Liz is right: folks with psychotic disorders going off the reservation, so to speak, and committing unspeakable violence is actually a pretty rare event. What's more, she's right that these rare acts seem to occur independent of someone's medication status. The NAMI and Treatment Advocacy Center crowds rarely acknowledge that. TAC is of course quick to waive the off-meds argument around anytime an incident pops up where a person is off-meds, but is utterly silent when someone happens to be treatment compliant, to use their terminology. It's also kind of offensive--now that I've reflected on things a bit--to present David Oaks (of MindFreedom, once upon a time diagnosed with schizophrenia), Madigan Shive (who I believe is connected with the wonderful Icarus Project and has a diagnosis of bipolar disorder) and Joe Pantoliano (of Sopranos fame and chronically depressed) as the faces of Mad Pride when none of them have ever been connected with anything violent, ever. It's cheap shot journalism. Oddly enough, Pantoliano's medication status is not discussed on the program. (And how does depression get hooked in with the program's "psychotic and dangerous and off-meds" theme? ABC's evidence would be what?) Spikol sums it up nicely: "This show is so bad, it’s like a joke. I guess it all goes back to what producer Ia Robinson told me, when we discussed my being on the show: She doesn’t have any friends or family who have mental problems, so the whole topic was like 'walking on the moon.' Yes, that’s the phrase she used. The show should’ve been blasted out to Mars." I also spoke with Robinson a few months ago when she was in the early stages of reporting for the show. Within five minutes I could tell she was someone who was way out of her depth with mental health issues and had that typical network news superficial take on things that leads no place good. She then had to go into a meeting for something or other and excused herself. I didn't bother calling her back. Not to be too much of a dick, but why are folks like that employed full-time in journalism when reporters like me are on the sidelines? Posted by Philip Dawdy at August 28, 2009 12:03 AM
del.icio.us
Digg it
reddit
Comments
Liz's analysis is excellent and Philip I agree with your comment about the poor quality of the journalism. Where was the research? What about a basic sense of compassion and respect for the people being interviewed? In too many cases the mainstream media approaches issues surrounding mental illness with an air of condescension and sensationalism. Philip and Liz please continue to speak out. We need to hear the intelligent thoughtful opinions of the people who actually know something about mental health issues. Posted by: Chris at August 28, 2009 12:18 PMI'd like to make the salient point that when someone is "off meds" and behaves violently that this may have next to nothing to do with their underlying mood problems and a whole heck of a lot to do with withdrawal and rebound. To blame violent behavior on "schizophrenia" for instance when someone abruptly goes off antipsychotics is IMO very unfair. It probably has a lot more to do with abrupt withdrawal and the very toxic effects the medication had on the brain over time (even if it was just a short time). We need to hear a lot more about chemical dependency on psych meds and what that does to behavior and a lot less about mood disorders and violence. I agree with Philip and Liz that it's extremely annoying to have neophytes tackling these topics for a mainstream media outlet. Posted by: Sara at August 28, 2009 12:26 PMMost people who are treated as though they are dangerous and unpredictable are most likely going to get drawn into that reality, sooner or later, I should have thought (like a child who is constantly told that they are bad, they will end up believing it, themselves). It may not have been True at the outset, but one only has to raise one's voice in anger to confirm everybody's worst fears, and the thing escalates from there. Nobody knows anything about mental illness, and it's about time that that was acknowledged. Matt Posted by: Matthew Holford at August 28, 2009 01:39 PMI was diagnosed with Bipolar II Disorder in January 2005, and I hate when I'm "lumped" into the group of people labeled "mentally ill". I take my medication as prescribed, and have had to change it due to mood changes. But not once have I been violent or have committed any heinous crimes. When people find out I have a mental illness, they immediately think that I may be "one of those people". My marriage ended because of this illness, but my perserverence to live a fruitful and benevolent life will not. I am a normal person, just like everyone else. This type of journalism is fueling the stigma, not "bringing light" to the subject. Posted by: Jennifer at August 28, 2009 01:47 PMThe emotion of Fear is a main tool in psychiatry. Patients in fear are quiet, submissive and obeadient. Patients show a great reduction in symptoms of mental illness when quiet.
In the old days of insane asylums, the truth about psychiatry was apparent: the madhouse was a snake pit, and snake pits were limited to insane asylums. Today’s snake pits—dispersed throughout society—are concealed by a façade of pseudomedical diagnoses, therapies, treatment-advocacy centers, alliances for the mentally ill, and the renaming of insane asylums as “health care facilities.” What inferences did and do doctors draw from their concepts of mental illness as brain disease? First, as Carl Wernicke (1848-1905), a prominent nineteenth-century German neuropsychiatrist observed, "The medical treatment of [mental] patients began with the infringement of their personal freedom." In addition, it began with "benevolent tortures," such as frightening them by throwing them into a pit of snakes, the origin of the term "snake pit" for insane asylum. More specifically, the humoral imbalance theory led Rush to employ "bleeding, purging, low diet, and the tranquilizing chair. "The tranquilizing chair was a chair-like contraption for confining the patient and rotating him until he became dizzy or lost consciousness. This was supposed to rebalance the circulation in the brain. It was but a small step from the nineteenth-century's tranquilizing chair to the twentieth century's tranquilizing drug, supposed to rebalance the chemical imbalance in the patient's brain. Posted by: mark p.s.2 at August 28, 2009 02:09 PMThis is a good post and gets across the fundamental point that bipolar disorder is very much misunderstood, to some extent the result of uninformed media. For a real-world, honest look at the repercussions of this illness, and what happens when proper treatment and support are lacking, I would like to recommend my recently released biographical novel, Broken Saint. It is based on my forty-year friendship with a bipolar man, and chronicles the internal and external struggles of his troubled life as he battles for stability and acceptance (of himself and by others). More information on the book is available at www.eloquentbooks.com/BrokenSaint.html. Mark Zamen, author Posted by: Mark Zamen at August 28, 2009 04:18 PM". . . why are folks like that employed full-time in journalism when reporters like me are on the sidelines?" Shameful injustice. You continue to do great work. I'm glad you're out there. Please know your labors are making a difference. Posted by: Gene Combs at August 29, 2009 09:25 AMFinally watched the show and I didn't like it -- Liz does a good job. The story of the kid who refused treatment and killed his mother was just too much. Who ever said that taking meds is the only treatment for heavens' sake? The kid sure needed some help. Just because he refused antipsychotics doesn't mean he should have been sent home to continue to play with knives and guns -- please give me a break. Are meds the only thing we have in our toolbox for these problems? I'd like to know the whole history of this kid too -- there was something going on that we didn't see in this documentary. Glad they made the point that Eric Harris was taking Luvox but they did not make the point that antidepressants are linked to mania and psychosis and violence -- unexpected, impulsive and out of character violence. Sure they showed a segment on withdrawal but they didn't show how withdrawal itself, if done too rapidly, can lead to violence. It was a very irritating and simplistic take on the issue and Kaplan was downright scary. I thought it was really rather ironic that this segment was on the same show as the segment on using wild mustang horses to reform prisoners and empower emotionally disabled kids -- that was too ironic for words. The healing power of love, trust, non-judgmental behavior, kindness -- OMG! What were the producers thinking? It should have been all one segment and then they would have been on to something. Posted by: Sara at August 30, 2009 09:52 PMPost a comment
|
Patient Blogs. Sites.
The Trouble With Spikol
Icarus Project Blog John's Bipolar Stories Seroxat (Paxil) Sufferers Stand Up! Seroxat (Paxil) Secrets The Bipolar View Writhe Safely soulful sepulcher Electro Boy Spiritual Emergency Mental Nurse Deborah Gray Mental Mommy The Splintered Mind bipolar.and.me Nurse Ratched Psych Person Trick Cycling for Beginners depression introspection Salted Lithium Living With A Purple Dog Polar Trippin' Mercurial Scribe Bipolar Chicks Blogging Beyond Meds Off Label Jung At Heart Graphic Truth Joysoup Apesma's Lament Soapy Water Outlaw Psychiatry Empirical Insanity Patient Anonymous Beyond Blue Psych Survivor Postpartum Progress The Happiness Project Finding Optimism The Gimp Parade Midlife and Treachery Secret Life of a Manic-Depressive Psych Tech Going Through Hell
Doctor Blogs. Sites.
Clinical Psych
World of Psychology CorePsych The Last Psychiatrist Carlat Report Blog Intueri Emotional Well-Being Scientific Misconduct Aaron Beck Cognitive Therapy Today Treatment Online Shrink Rap David Healy Dr. Dork NHS Blog Doctor Dr. X's Free Associations Dr. Sanity Anxious Mind Everyone Needs Therapy Counselling Resource
Activists. News.
Charlottesville Prejudice Watch
The Icarus Project MindFreedom AHRP Blog SSRI Stories Healthy Skepticism Psych Rights Treatment Advocacy Center Peter Breggin Schizophrenia News eDrugSearch Blog Nuts R Us News Disapedia WSJ Health Blog Alison Bass
Social Networking. Forums.
Beyond Meds Social Network
Mood Garden Paxil Progress Crazy Boards Forums Psych Central Forums Icarus Project Forums DepressionTribe MySpace Bipolar Group Bipolar World Pendulum.org Bipolar Planet About.com Bipolar
Science. Big Pharma. Ethics.
PharmaLot
Pharma Gossip Science Blogs Mind Hacks GoozNews Integrity in Science Neurophilospohy bioethics.net Drug Wonks Pharma Marketing Blog Pharma's Cutting Edge On Pharma Health Care Renewal
Current Affairs
Buzz Machine
To The People Andrew Sullivan Michelle Malkin Daily Kos Reason's Hit&Run The Agitator Press Think Jim Romenesko Rough Type Gawker The Graphic Truth Tail Rank Huffington Post Instapundit Little Green Footballs Talking Points Memo MoJo Blog
Seattle Stuff
Smoking. Stuff.
|

