March 13, 2009

JAMA Editor Calls Critic a "Nobody And A Nothing"

Yesterday, I reported on a dustup between Jonathan Leo, a neuroanatomy professor at Lincoln Memorial University in Tennessee, and Catherine DeAngelis, editor in chief of JAMA and an alleged foe of conflict of interest in academic publishing. Leo and his colleague Jeffrey Lacasee, an assistant professor of social work at Arizona State University, had raised a ruckus with the journal for an unreported conflict in a study of the use of Lexapro and psychotherapy in post-stroke patients published in JAMA last year. The lead author had gotten money from Lexapro's maker in the past, but didn't report it to the journal.

The Wall Street Journal's health blog is now reporting some details of Leo and JAMA's exchange and it sure makes the journal look stupid, especially considering that Leo and Lacasse were helping to journal hew to its mission on rooting out conflicts of interest:

"Leo says he received an angry call from JAMA executive deputy editor Phil Fontanarosa last week, shortly after Leo’s article was published on the BMJ Web site. 'He said, "Who do you think you are,"' says Leo. “He then said, ‘You are banned from JAMA for life. You will be sorry. Your school will be sorry. Your students will be sorry.” Fontanarosa referred a call for comment to a JAMA spokeswoman, who said Leo’s retelling of the conversation was 'inaccurate.'

"'He did talk to the guy, but he said he didn’t threaten him,' the spokeswoman said. 'It was something along the lines of not setting a good example for students. He didn’t say he would be banned. He didn’t think Leo was taking a very good approach by taking this confidential process within JAMA out to media and another medical journal. It’s just not the way things are handled here.'

"The call from Fontanarosa was followed up by ones from JAMA editor-in-chief Catherine DeAngelis to Leo’s superiors, Leo says. He said she asked his superiors to get him to retract his article in the BMJ. Leo says he decided to call DeAngelis directly to find out what, in particular, she might be objecting to. He said she was 'very upset' but didn’t make specific complaints about the article.

"In a conversation with us, DeAngelis was none too happy to be questioned about the dust-up with Leo.

"'This guy is a nobody and a nothing' she said of Leo. 'He is trying to make a name for himself. Please call me about something important.' She added that Leo 'should be spending time with his students instead of doing this.'

"When asked if she called his superiors and what she said to them, DeAngelis said 'it is none of your business.' She added that she did not threaten Leo or anyone at the school."

You begin to wonder who the hell the folks running JAMA think they are and you have to wonder if they were actually going to force the study author to reveal his conflict, as he did in JAMA earlier this week, or if JAMA was pressed to do so by what Leo and Lacasse published on the British Medical Journal website last week.

Either way, I hope JAMA's board looks into this affair, which seems to be way out of order.

Posted by Philip Dawdy at March 13, 2009 12:00 PM
StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Digg it reddit
Comments

We now live in a Pharmocracy.

Posted by: Lilly NC at March 13, 2009 12:05 PM

She sounds as arrogant as the rest of 'em.

Posted by: Stephany at March 13, 2009 04:43 PM

Phil:
Can you forward your reporting on this issue to Senator Grassely's committee?

Posted by: Tom at March 13, 2009 07:48 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






pic1.jpg

Patient Blogs. Sites.
Doctor Blogs. Sites.
Activists. News.
Social Networking. Forums.
Science. Big Pharma. Ethics.
Current Affairs
Seattle Stuff
Smoking. Stuff.

Info
About Furious Seasons
Email
Other Articles
ZYPREXA Documents
Alt ZYPREXA Documents Source
Blakemore-Brown Transcript

 Subscribe in a reader

Search


Recent Entries
$99 Left
$114 To Go
Winter Fundraiser, $134 To Go, Final Day
Ruth Lilly, Eli Lilly Heiress, Prozac Beneficiary Dies At 94
Winter Fundraiser, Final Day, Less Than $200 To Go
UCLA Psychiatrist Criticizes DSM-5
Winter Fundraiser, Barely $200 To Go
Most Popular Posts Of 2009
Winter Fundraiser, Less Than $300 Left, Let's Wrap It Up
Senate Health Care Bill Contains $1.25 Billion Gift To Sen. Stabenow
Travel Day, Comment Approval May Be Intermittent
Winter Fundraiser, Close But Stalled
Senate Health Care Reform Bill Contains Controversial MOTHERS Act, Abortion Study
Adult ADHD And Sleep Problems
Vic Chesnutt Dead At 45, Possible Suicide
Recent Comments

Tom on JAMA Editor Calls Critic a "Nobody And A Nothing"

Stephany on JAMA Editor Calls Critic a "Nobody And A Nothing"

Lilly NC on JAMA Editor Calls Critic a "Nobody And A Nothing"

Archives
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
Resources
Mental Health America
National Alliance on Mental Illness
Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance
National Institute of Mental Health
McMan Web
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2