October 23, 2008Chantix Is Tops At Causing ProblemsChantix, Pfizer's stop smoking drug, topped the list of drugs causing problems that led to adverse events reports being filed with the FDA in the first quarter of 2008. The stop smoking drug, which sure unglues people like a bad old SSRI, racked up a total of 1,001 adverse events reports and reports of another 50 deaths linked to the use of the drug, according to the Institute for Safe Medication Practices. That's simply astonishing for a drug that's barely two years old--and which I was one of the first in the media to identify as a problem drug last year. You can read ISMP's report here. Other problem drugs included heparin and OxyContin. Posted by Philip Dawdy at October 23, 2008 12:03 AM
del.icio.us
Digg it
reddit
Comments
The Chantix series is great reporting here, the link to your series is worth reading for a review of just how cutting edge this blog is! Posted by: Stephany at October 23, 2008 06:40 AMThere are too many conflicts with many of those cases to blame them all on Chantix. Posted by: Dale Hanks at October 23, 2008 10:43 AMDale, What exactly are the "too many of those cases"? When side effects from medications are reported to the FDA no personal information is provided. The drug companies have no way of knowing if someone who suffered the side effects of this drug were in fact mental ill. The drug company for Chantix is attempting to do what it did successfully with antidepressants, blame the patients. Without personal information the drug company are spinning the drug effects. Blame the patient for an underlieing psychiartic disorder and keep selling the killer drug. They also believe they can get away with this because society hates smokers just like they hate people with mental illness. It will be very interesting to see the raw data on this drug once the lawsuits get going. I won't in the least bit be surprized to find some pretty horrible side effects occurred in the trials that were hid and covered up. There is a reason pfizer excluded anyone with a mental illness from being in their studies. A population that the drug companies hoped to pursue with the drug. I read a press release that stated the mental ill was the population they intended to target. So why were they excluded? I also think we will find that the doctors pushing this medication have huge conflicts of interest. The psychiartic side effects are not only occuring in patients that stopped the nicotine. Even people who did not stop smoking have suffered the consequences of this drug. Stop blaming the patients, at least until all the data is in. Posted by: carol at October 23, 2008 12:29 PMIt's on the market on Brazil. sorry, I have to say it from time to time.
What I consider to be the moronic statement of at least the month from a Pharaceutical company: "Pfizer said Wednesday it stands by Chantix, and that the volume of reports might be linked to publicity about the side effects." Also quoted from the above article (and what seems to me to be one of the FDA's core problems) "The FDA defines serious drug reactions as ones that cause hospitalization, require medical intervention, or place a life in jeopardy. The agency's monitoring system relies on voluntary reports from doctors and is only believed to capture a fraction of overall problems." I focus mainly on the words "voluntary reports" in that sentence. I didn't realize, until earlier this year, that doctors were not required to report adverse events to the FDA. While I was on Lamictal I was experiencing severe spike headaches (once caused temporary blackout while I was driving) and nose bleeds. After going through previous medical records I discovered I had been on Lamictal years earlier and had experienced the same side effects. (Didn't remember it because of memory voids caused by ECT.) The Pdoc I was seeing that had prescribed it the second time stated he'd never seen that side effect before. But I have since learned he did not submit an adverse event report. My point being, I guess, that if they are not REQUIRED to make reports, then how do they really know whether a side effect is common or rare? If doctors are relying predominently on the side effects cited during trials and not following up through reporting all adverse effects, then no one is getting the real picture of how a drug is doing. And we're all familiar how the psychiatric community feels about anecdotal "evidence". Wouldn't making an official report to the FDA kind of make it less anecdotal? Post a comment
|
Patient Blogs. Sites.
The Trouble With Spikol
Icarus Project Blog John's Bipolar Stories Seroxat (Paxil) Sufferers Stand Up! Seroxat (Paxil) Secrets The Bipolar View Writhe Safely soulful sepulcher Electro Boy Spiritual Emergency Mental Nurse Deborah Gray Mental Mommy The Splintered Mind bipolar.and.me Nurse Ratched Psych Person Trick Cycling for Beginners depression introspection Salted Lithium Living With A Purple Dog Polar Trippin' Mercurial Scribe Bipolar Chicks Blogging Beyond Meds Off Label Jung At Heart Graphic Truth Joysoup Apesma's Lament Soapy Water Outlaw Psychiatry Empirical Insanity Patient Anonymous Beyond Blue Psych Survivor Postpartum Progress The Happiness Project Finding Optimism The Gimp Parade Midlife and Treachery Secret Life of a Manic-Depressive Psych Tech Going Through Hell
Doctor Blogs. Sites.
Clinical Psych
World of Psychology CorePsych The Last Psychiatrist Carlat Report Blog Intueri Emotional Well-Being Scientific Misconduct Aaron Beck Cognitive Therapy Today Treatment Online Shrink Rap David Healy Dr. Dork NHS Blog Doctor Dr. X's Free Associations Dr. Sanity Anxious Mind Everyone Needs Therapy Counselling Resource
Activists. News.
Charlottesville Prejudice Watch
The Icarus Project MindFreedom AHRP Blog SSRI Stories Healthy Skepticism Psych Rights Treatment Advocacy Center Peter Breggin Schizophrenia News eDrugSearch Blog Nuts R Us News Disapedia WSJ Health Blog Alison Bass
Social Networking. Forums.
Beyond Meds Social Network
Mood Garden Paxil Progress Crazy Boards Forums Psych Central Forums Icarus Project Forums DepressionTribe MySpace Bipolar Group Bipolar World Pendulum.org Bipolar Planet About.com Bipolar
Science. Big Pharma. Ethics.
PharmaLot
Pharma Gossip Science Blogs Mind Hacks GoozNews Integrity in Science Neurophilospohy bioethics.net Drug Wonks Pharma Marketing Blog Pharma's Cutting Edge On Pharma Health Care Renewal
Current Affairs
Buzz Machine
To The People Andrew Sullivan Michelle Malkin Daily Kos Reason's Hit&Run The Agitator Press Think Jim Romenesko Rough Type Gawker The Graphic Truth Tail Rank Huffington Post Instapundit Little Green Footballs Talking Points Memo MoJo Blog
Seattle Stuff
Smoking. Stuff.
|

