August 08, 2008

Notes On Language

Some people have been chipping me up in comments the last week or so over my choice of words on this site. When I noted that someone "mans" a phone, I wasn't being PC enough. When I used the term sociopath, I was told the term is meaningless (would you prefer I use evil, remorseless motherfucker? Is that any more specific?). And, there have been all manner of gripes lately over my use of the terms bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. And, that's not to forget the protests that erupt if I use the terms borderline or PTSD.

Look, I don't control language in our culture. I recognize there are all sorts of problems with a term like bipolar disorder--what does it really mean? How is it measured? Isn't it just oppressive psych docs fucking up powerless humans and using the labels of language as their M-16?--because there are all sorts of problems with defining human behavior when you cannot chase it back to a simple, testable physical cause and when bipolar disorder plays out much differently with different people.

I use the stock phrases of current-day psychiatry because I have nothing else to work with that a wide group of people can understand easily and because all those conversations about "Ooooh, let's change the terminology and fight the oppressive system" talk are only amusing in grad school when a prof will approve of your linguistic trickery and give you a good grade. In the real world, an editor will tell you stop sucking your thumb and get to your point.

Over the last three decades that I've been a serious reader and writer, I've noticed that the writers who spend their time railing against terminology in this or that field are generally terrible writers and take far too long to get simple ideas across to their audience. I don't want to to be one of those writers. I hope I'm not.

That said, I respect the point some of you are making, but I am already doing far too much with this site--and spending far too much time doing it--to get into language wars in a universe that really doesn't care very much. Besides, finding some nice new PC terms to use in place of various disorders really would do zero to change the social and clinical reality many of us face. I average about 30,000 words a month on this site--go find me another blogger or reporter who does--and I've simply got other concerns.

If you don't like the terms I use, feel free to bitch in comments. Or better yet: go start your own blog, write 30,000 words a month, do it for three years and then get back to me on where you are at.

Keep something else in mind about language as well.

Back in 1994, the nice folks who make the DSM changed manic depression to bipolar disorder. The thinking was that a new term would clear the decks for patients and reduce social stigma and the general public wouldn't react with fear upon hearing the term bipolar disorder the way they did when they heard manic depression. We know how that worked out right?

NOTE: I am taking today off--part of an August slowdown that I've frankly earned--and will be on the road to Portland. I have no idea what my computer access will be like in Puddletown, so comment moderation will likely be erratic until I am back late Saturday.

Have a nice weekend.

Posted by Philip Dawdy at August 8, 2008 12:03 AM
StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Digg it reddit
Comments

There you are!
Anybody has any remark?
I don't understand "fearing" words or this PC thing.
Once I was on the mental institution and a man asked me:
"-Are you a psychologist?"
I've look at him and said smiling. "-Nope! I'm also crazy!"
He smiled at me and we started a good chat. Everytime I go there we talk.
Down here the term "neurotic" that back in the eighties was used to explain "social relationships" that were not good; politics that are not "normal"... everything was "neurotic".
We had "urban neurosis" and every individual was considered neurotic in a way.
On the beginning of this century following what was created on the nighties... things are schizophrenics.
The economy, the politics, family relationships... name it... everything is schizophrenic.
It became an adjective to express anomie and other stuffs.
In the movie "Interromped Girl" there's a scene where the Angelina Jolie's character asks for all the things that can be put in an ice-cream: she asks for cerises; chocolate.. blah blah and does not say one of the ingredients. So the bartender says: "-Nuts?" she starts laughing as well as all her friends who were on that mental institution.
But these people who are "correcting" words and stuff doesn't give a damn for grammar, semantics...
you just want to... pentelhar.
There! Here is a Portuguese slang verb meaning upset, annoy, mock, fuss... you understood.
It's appalling that Philip had to write a post like this.
It only shows that those who are desperate to contradict what the vast majority of people in this blog believe has NO sufficient good arguments .
So you behave like a troll and create problems that doesn't exist. The statistics evidence:
it's funny! according to the methodology you can have the result you want!
It just happened here. The explanation why some people are now considered "middle class" was statistically analised in two ways that contradict each other.
And this is a subject that should be considered exact!
Grow up!

Posted by: Ana at August 8, 2008 12:28 AM

Ignore the twits. It's worth having a discussion about the use of language, but this is not the most appropriate forum for it. I'm sorry to hear you've been getting harassed by people who prefer to nitpick and split hairs, rather than move forward - or at the very least be grateful for your efforts on this site. Goodness knows I am. So thank you, and again, ignore the twits.

Posted by: Jordan at August 8, 2008 12:49 AM

Have fun, you've earned it. Hopefully you won't even see this post until sometime next week!

When I was 20, I too would have complained about "manning" a phone and then talked all night about my comment with my friends who were also studying herstory. These days I've got bigger fish to fry, but the kid does make a valid point.

The problem is figuring out how to make such points while still communicating. PC language can sometimes lead to the callousness of what I think of as the "to sir with love" syndrome. That was the movie where the teacher gets the smitten teenager's love letter and corrects the grammar, humiliating the kid into suicide while never seeing the point of the letter. You're a good writer Philip. It would be impossible to write about "mental" illness without inciting the ire of someone.

That said, there's a difference in using language directly to harm and what goes on in the psych world. The language of the dsm and the media language used about the "mentally" ill has a lot to do with the evil idea that you have to harm the "mentally" ill to help us. If we harm you, we're sick, if you harm us, you're being nice.

I prefer to describe people who think or have it thought of them that they have "bipolar disorder or schizophrenia" as labeled as having "bipolar disorder" using the scare quotes because that kind of thinking really is scary, just putting scare quotes around those terms does more to help remove stigma from people labeled as mentally ill than 200 years of protests.

As for "sociopath," I would prefer you use "evil, remorseless motherfucker?" Evil, remorseless motherfuckers exist. Describing evil remorseless, motherfuckers as sick really does harm people who for some reason either find their own psych labels helpful or have no control over the psych label thrust upon them. Whatever anyone may think about psychiatry, when evil behavior is described as sick, people who are labeled as "mentally" sick are viewed as evil. A case in point would be the Cho thing. The evil, remorseless motherfucker was given the label "social anxiety disorder." Now kids with that label can't go to college. To suggest that his "sad" caused him to kill, is like suggesting that because he's Korean, he's evil. It would be unpc to do so because society has to some extent improved in dealing with racist language, people who speak out here are trying to do the some thing for "the mentally ill."

Again, have a good trip.

Posted by: Sally at August 8, 2008 01:55 AM

Oh Cripes. I am so sorry.

Dog Days of summer, everyone is on tenterhooks.

When I taught Freshman Comp, I used Hayakawa . He had a whole thing on the word "Chair" Write it on the black board , and ask students to describe it on a piece of paper.

You would get rocking, blue, Laz y boy, Eames, kitchen, electric, etc. No one would ever duplicate.

Such is the beauty and the terror of the English language.

Philip, you have a gift for writing and I am sorry if this has caused you any consternation.

Enjoy your mini vacation.

Posted by: susan at August 8, 2008 04:39 AM

You can't win can you?

I remember once, I wrote a newsletter for the parents of a kids football team I used to help coach.


I wrote that we were having a meeting and for moms and dads to turn up.


A week or so later I was stopped by one of the parents and told I was insensitive because she was divorced!


Go figure?


Phil, if they don't like it then FUCK EM!


Fid

Posted by: BOB FIDDAMAN at August 8, 2008 04:42 AM

Words and language are still our most powerful form of communication yet all this "political correctness" nonsense drowns out the importance of what language and words actually do, which is ... to enable us to express our thoughts, feelings and emotions.

Words are indeed powerful and choice of word can change whole contexts and opinions , inflame whole cultures and even start wars.
They are hugely important and psychiatry , the media and governments have been using words and language as weapons for a long time. All this political correctness stuff is just a form of censorship , give me a "balls on the table, no holds barred" conversation any day of the week.

You are a great writer Philip, and you have a great command of language, don't let a few idiots stop you from what you do best!

As we say where I am from , "fuck the begrudgers" ...

:) :) :)

Posted by: truthman30 at August 8, 2008 05:34 AM

This is a non PC rant that will surely offend someone, and I don't care.

As long as this discussion is continuing want my opinion? I get hate emails all of the time as a blog author, you cannot always please everyone all of the time.

I find it weird, yes I do! that people freaked out about the "mans a suicide hotline" thing. God get a life!

Call me non-PC or a whiny bitch (that's what some of my hate emails call me besides a fucking murderer, anti med Nazi, you name it).

Keep up the good work here Philip, you are the award winning journalist the commenters are NOT.

Posted by: Stephany at August 8, 2008 07:43 AM

Philip,

Write what you want to write the way that you want to.

I have seen the overly sensitive touchy feeling PC censure here and personally I have little patience for making other people feel good about words.

There are so many more things to get upset about in this world if you are looking to get upset at something.

Some folks just need to step back and get a grip.

I don't know where people pick that up. I don't know if it is a humanities course thing or what.

Don't let it stop it, as you said, you have no control over the use of language in our culture

Frankly I do not believe in nor do I like labels like SZ, BiPD, BP, ODD, etc,

We do need some kind of common convention to discuss mental health symptoms and the mean old labels do a bit more to fulfill a descriptive role than the labels 'disturbed', 'insane', 'bat shit crazy' and 'off their rocker'

Then again, I am not PC myself, so I might just refer to someone as bat shit crazy regardless of their *official diagnostic label*

Let them grow a thicker skin Philip and focus on what is really important in mental health journalism.

Posted by: Jane Alexander at August 8, 2008 08:27 AM

For those people who don't like what is written here, I have a crazy idea, don't come to the site. I know this may seem like an odd request but I see it as the same logical as watching TV. If you don't like what you are seeing, change the channel. If you don't like what you are reading, skip the blog. Very complicated thinking here. Sorry you have to deal with this nonsense Philip, enjoy your vacation.

Posted by: Angie at August 8, 2008 09:43 AM

I live in Berkeley, and it has to be the most notorious place for PC. I think anything can be taken too far. I have more tolerance for language semantics corrections than other issues, unless I feel the person correcting me is doing it out of some other motive, hostility, jealousy, just-plain-meanness, etc. I guess if I were a journalist I would be more affronted. I think if I got affronted every time someone "corrected" me, well, god knows what I'd do. I haven't heard any of my English teachers or professors encourage PC language usage. One of them actually said she would rather we be sexist than use incorrect english. In regards to the term "sociopath," one of my parenting class teachers said that if babies don't get enough affection, they grow up to be sociopathic, meaning they don't have the ability to care about other people or have sympathy or regret for causing pain to other people. I immediately thought of an ex-boyfriend I had had...

Posted by: Sophia at August 8, 2008 11:11 AM

ah berkeley, my lovely alma mater. ah berkeley, the city where housing discrimination is based on food choices and whether or not you are fragrance free. ah berkeley was once such a fun place but got over run by the uptight crowd who now even go after the homeless. for smoking of course.

god i don't miss berkeley

Posted by: Philip Dawdy at August 8, 2008 11:22 AM

Philip, I see your response as a STFU, however longwinded. How pc of you to go such lengths to respond to the criticism.

You're a good guy and a great writer.

My motto is "fuck the haters". Not literally, of course. But, now that I think about it... that could work.

Posted by: notveryanonymousmom at August 8, 2008 12:34 PM

"finding some nice new PC terms to use in place of various disorders really would do zero to change the social and clinical reality many of us face"

As a 40-year veteran Consumer (love that word, why is it better than patient? Oh, I digress).

Amen, Philip. Please just keep writing as you do! Don't change your voice or waste your precious energy and talent on that PC crap. Personual labor and person hole covers are next, I am sure.

Posted by: Deborah at August 8, 2008 02:38 PM

hah Deborah! "person hole covers" ...just like the last 3 days sitting in construction while road paving was going on the bright orange signs read "men at work" and EVERY STEAM ROLLER was "manned" by a woman!

Posted by: Stephany at August 8, 2008 07:35 PM

I hope you have a lovely weekend phillip...
thank you for what you do here....you are the best!
bizi

Posted by: bizi at August 8, 2008 09:30 PM

Philip,

Go on vacation already!

Deborah, You're right that Philip's writing is more than okay the way it is. We are splitting hairs here, and this time it feels like my fur.

I think the whole psychiatric problem is largely if not mainly about language, about classification.

When a person without a psych label is passionate, it's a regarded as a good thing, when someone labeled bipolar is passionate, it's mania. It's not that what the two people are doing is different, it's how it's labeled.

When the word schizophrenia (or any other dsm label) is written in a medical chart to describe someone, their/my whole life changes, their liberty is simply taken away. The harm is caused by the word, a word that denotes all sorts of horrible things and implies some sort of diagnostic tests that do not exist. If the pshrink swings the other way and doesn't label but instead writes mental exhaustion, no problem (well except that insurance won't cover the costs).

Changing language, like any other change, sometimes has unexpected results. Your example of consumer instead of patient is a perfect example. I'm not sure how the label consumer was supposed to help patients. If I go to a doctor, I'm his patient. There's a certain amount of sympathy built into being classified as a patient. Patients are allowed to go to the doctor whether they have money or not because we/they are sick.

The term consumers on the other hand implies a selfish entitlement mentality which does play into the entire biopsych idea that mental health consumers are born so unreasonable they/we are not entitled to civil rights, that anytime we look for help with our distress we are selfish, destructive miscreants who must be managed not sympathized with or assisted, and should pay for the privilege of being managed, i.e. tortured. (see Bipolar Bunny's excellent post related to this under the susieQ and abuse thread).

Yet I would imagine the term was developed by decent, well intentioned people doing their best to improve the lot of those of us with psych labels, kind of like how I am certain that when Philip writes about phones being maned, he's neither consciously nor unconsciously attempting to demean women.

But the person who pointed to the usage of maning in that context isn't saying he was, she's saying that the discrimination is built into our language and was there before Philip learned to walk, or at least I think that's what she's saying. Anyway identifying these things and discussing them is not always criticism, sometimes it's an honest attempt at discussing a problem.

Of course pc language sometimes fails drastically. Back when I was a nascent feminist, the other feminists would slam me for referring to my close, lifetime female friends as girlfriends. I felt humiliated and angry. That pc crowd was worse than the wrongs they were trying to right, sort of like the Maoists with their re-education camps were at the very least as misguided as the oppressive regimes before them, but which way is the most evil, that's the question.

Meanwhile, pc language that fails should be thrown out. But no one should be discouraged from trying on new terms IMHO.

Posted by: Sally at August 9, 2008 12:54 AM

I read your blog and comment little. I hope that you will soon be able to put aside your frustrations with your errant readers, whoever they may be, and take enjoyment again in your work. It's good work. It's worthy work. Your readers are clearly of all stripes...some cranky and vociferous...some cheery and supportive...some philosophical and some this that or the other. The point is, I guess, that we all come here to read your words. Our responses, some written, but most silent, are not the point. The point is what you have to say. Please say it and then try to be at peace with it. We are listening. What we do with it is our concern.

Posted by: Melissa at August 9, 2008 04:02 AM

Amen to Melissa and Sally

You both said it better than I could.


Posted by: susan at August 9, 2008 10:54 AM

Philip, you said "Ooooh, let's change the terminology and fight the oppressive system."

Unfortunately what actually happens is that people change the terminology and consider their work done. Calling the wheelchair-bound "gimps" is offensive, no doubt, and "physically disabled" of course is better terminology. However, what they need is better access, e.g. ramps, rather than a fancy new name. "Cripple" is a bad word now, I understand.

And I will continue to refer to myself as a gimp or nutter. People in the minority group in question call the shots.

Posted by: Francesca Allan at August 9, 2008 11:49 AM

http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.com/2008/05/28/101-being-offended/

Posted by: flawedplan at August 9, 2008 12:20 PM

Melissa,
I agree with all you said.
I just want to remember, just in case, that Philip knows it all and the "corrections" people did are not even corrections.
These were trolls trying to spoil it all.
I don't even remember about the corrections.
It made no sense.
The psychopath I remember..
Perhaps I'll follow Philip's idea and call them "motherfuckers".
Breaking News:

"Motherfucker kills mother and is assumed to by bipolar"

Ok!
I surrender!
Each one of us, me included :o), must follow Shakespeare steps and leave 25.000 words to English vocabulary.
It's a deal!

Posted by: Ana at August 9, 2008 01:24 PM

Wrong: is presumed to BE Bipolar" I meant...

Posted by: Ana at August 9, 2008 01:26 PM

hello. i am new to your blog. your choice of words doesn't bother me none. you have to find some way of expressing what needs to be expressed. i want to read more of you...perhaps figure out what to do with me and my many moods.

Posted by: merelyme at August 9, 2008 05:46 PM

Philip, you forgot to say that the cost of living here in Berkeley is ridiculous and that there are camping nature-nazis with PHD's coming out of our asses. LOL!

Posted by: Sophia at August 9, 2008 07:47 PM

I'm probably in the minority in saying that I think "bipolar disorder" has a less unfavorable connotation in the media and in pop culture than "manic depression."

But not by bloody much.

Posted by: Larry at August 9, 2008 11:28 PM

having worked in a few newsrooms with some fairly cynical metro desk sorts, i can assure you that the media views bp and m-d as being the same, which is to say a term meaning 'crazy.' even the nyt recently characterized bp that way at the top of its patients voices thing on bp.

Posted by: Philip Dawdy at August 9, 2008 11:33 PM

The world is a very big place and every blogger knows that there isn't a blog post that exists that doesn't have the potential to elicit the hostile grandiosity of a tiny mind somewhere in the world.

Posted by: Dr X at August 10, 2008 10:01 AM

"Nostradamuses"
I guess Philip has already made 1 contribution to the English language. (at least this is the one I can remember now)

Google Search nostradamuse

Did you mean to search for: nostradamus
There are results in German and some French people uses it as a nickname.
Not a single site in English.

I hope he is in a good mood and it's sunny over there. it's not sunny here.

Posted by: Ana at August 10, 2008 11:46 AM

Complaining about being PC? That's petty.

Posted by: Marissa at August 14, 2008 01:49 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






pic1.jpg

Patient Blogs. Sites.
Doctor Blogs. Sites.
Activists. News.
Social Networking. Forums.
Science. Big Pharma. Ethics.
Current Affairs
Seattle Stuff
Smoking. Stuff.

Info
About Furious Seasons
Email
Other Articles
ZYPREXA Documents
Alt ZYPREXA Documents Source
Blakemore-Brown Transcript

 Subscribe in a reader

Search


Recent Entries
$99 Left
$114 To Go
Winter Fundraiser, $134 To Go, Final Day
Ruth Lilly, Eli Lilly Heiress, Prozac Beneficiary Dies At 94
Winter Fundraiser, Final Day, Less Than $200 To Go
UCLA Psychiatrist Criticizes DSM-5
Winter Fundraiser, Barely $200 To Go
Most Popular Posts Of 2009
Winter Fundraiser, Less Than $300 Left, Let's Wrap It Up
Senate Health Care Bill Contains $1.25 Billion Gift To Sen. Stabenow
Travel Day, Comment Approval May Be Intermittent
Winter Fundraiser, Close But Stalled
Senate Health Care Reform Bill Contains Controversial MOTHERS Act, Abortion Study
Adult ADHD And Sleep Problems
Vic Chesnutt Dead At 45, Possible Suicide
Recent Comments

Marissa on Notes On Language

Ana on Notes On Language

Dr X on Notes On Language

Philip Dawdy on Notes On Language

Larry on Notes On Language

Sophia on Notes On Language

merelyme on Notes On Language

Ana on Notes On Language

Ana on Notes On Language

flawedplan on Notes On Language

Archives
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
Resources
Mental Health America
National Alliance on Mental Illness
Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance
National Institute of Mental Health
McMan Web
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2