June 06, 2008

Medicating Our Troops

There's a fascinating article in Time this week, and that's not something I say about that mag very often. The mag has gone and taken an in-depth look at how many troops in Iraq and Afghanistan are being medicated for depression and sent back to the front lines. Sixteen percent of troops are taking anti-depressants and it all just goes from there.

War is truly hell.

It's nice to see someone in the mainstream media take a poke at this issue. I'm not sure that the article is entirely successful--there are some stats in it that are just wrong--but globally I give the mag credit for doing a fair and balanced job. One Army official, for example, is quoted saying he believes the troops get good care (which I doubt, but what else would he say?) and the magazine even delicately swings at the question of anti-depessant use and suicide:

"At least 115 soldiers killed themselves last year, including 36 in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Army said on May 29. That's the highest toll since it started keeping such records in 1980. Nearly 40% of Army suicide victims in 2006 and 2007 took psychotropic drugs — overwhelmingly, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) like Prozac and Zoloft. While the Army cites failed relationships as the primary cause, some outside experts sense a link between suicides and prescription-drug use — though there is also no way of knowing how many suicide attempts the antidepressants may have prevented by improving a soldier's spirits. 'The high percentage of U.S. soldiers attempting suicide after taking SSRIs should raise serious concerns,' says Dr. Joseph Glenmullen, who teaches psychiatry at Harvard Medical School. 'And there's no question they're using them to prop people up in difficult circumstances.'"

Forty percent is a discouragingly high percentage. I'll leave it at that.

One thing that mag leaves largely untouched is how these troops will do once the Iraq War is over (assuming it ever is. Afghanistan is a different story), or how they do when they rotate home. I have even larger concerns about their long-term health and how many troops might end up not being able to get off anti-depressants. But that's for another day.

For now, it's pretty clear to me that America is going to be reaping the whirlwind of the Iraq War for a long time. Thanks very much, President Bush.

Posted by Philip Dawdy at June 6, 2008 12:03 AM
StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Digg it reddit
Comments

We must be very grateful to Bush family. We must remember that Bush father has already been on Eli-Lilly company's board. By the time Prozac was launched!
Googling "bush eli-lilly":
Results 1 - 10 of about 387,000 for bush eli-lilly. (0.22 seconds)

The Lillygates are reported here:
http://www.antidepressantsfacts.com/Bush-Lilly-CIA-serotonin.htm

Eli Lilly, Zyprexa & The Bush Family

"Corrupt connections between Bush Family, psychiatry, and Eli Lilly & Company
More than one journalist has uncovered corrupt connections between the Bush Family, psychiatry, and Eli Lilly & Company, the giant pharmaceutical corporation. While previous Lillygates have been more colorful, Lilly's soaking state Medicaid programs with Zyprexa-its blockbuster, antipsychotic drug-may pack the greatest financial wallop. Worldwide in 2003, Zyprexa grossed $4.28 billion, accounting for slightly more than one-third of Lilly's total sales. In the United States in 2003, Zyprexa grossed $2.63 billion, 70 percent of that attributable to government agencies, mostly Medicaid.

Historically, the exposure of any single Lilly machination-though sometimes disrupting it-has not weakened the Bush-psychiatry-Lilly relationship. In the last decade, some of the more widely reported Eli Lilly intrigues include:
a. Influencing the Homeland Security Act to protect itself from lawsuits
b. Accessing confidential patient records for a Prozac sample mailing
c. Rigging the Wesbecker Prozac-violence trial

A sample of those who have been on the Eli Lilly payroll includes:
a. Former President George Herbert Walker Bush (one-time member of the Eli Lilly board of directors)
b. Former CEO of Enron, Ken Lay (one-time member of the Eli Lilly board of directors)
c. George W. Bush's former director of Management and Budget, Mitch Daniels(a former Eli Lilly vice president)
d. George W. Bush's Homeland Security Advisory Council member, Sidney Taurel (current CEO of Eli Lilly)
e. The National Alliance for the Mentally Ill (a recipient of Eli L........"

.............

"Joseph Wesbecker - Prozac/Sarafem (fluoxetine)
Perhaps the most cinematic of all Lillygates culminated in 1997. The story began in 1989 when Joseph Wesbecker-one month after he began taking Prozac-opened fire with his AK-47 at his former place of employment, killing 8 and wounding 12 before taking his own life. British journalist John Cornwell covered the Louisville, Kentucky trial for the London Sunday Times Magazine, ultimately writing a book about it. Cornwell's The Power to Harm (1996) is not only about a disgruntled employee becoming violent after taking Prozac, but is also about Eli Lilly's power to corrupt the judicial system.
Victims of Joseph Wesbecker sued Eli Lilly, claiming that Prozac had pushed Wesbecker over the edge. The trial took place in 1994, but received scant attention as the public was transfixed by the O.J. Simpson spectacle. While Eli Lilly had been settling many Prozac violence cases behind closed doors (more than 150 Prozac lawsuits had been filed by the end of........"

By Bruce E. Levine, PhD

I believe you all have already read it.
When we search ssristories by date the first stories are Prozac drug-induced behavior.

Two off the latest stories:

Suicide Antidepressant Withdrawal 2008-05-26 Iraq/Texas Soldier Commits Suicide: Was a 19 Year Veteran with a Family

Unethical Antidepressants 2008-06-01 Iraq/Oregon Soldier Is Not Allowed to Speak to a Counselor Unless he Takes Antidepressants First


Posted by: Ana at June 6, 2008 04:13 AM

Great, we're giving the soldiers sedatives so they don't have to think about what they are doing out there.

Posted by: Erik at June 6, 2008 06:02 AM

Last month I saw a documentary on Iraq veterans. It was interviews with some of them and their problems coping with losing legs, an eye... you must already seem this one or others.

One of them didn't suffer physical lost but was disturbed like all others which is a condition that I believe many people can understand.
After "All Quiet on the Western Front", the book and the movie, and many reports of so many wars it should be common knowledge that no human being can experience war without being deeply touched moved.
This man said: "-I don't want to take a pill to wake up and another to sleep. This is not the kind of life I want for me. I don't want to take a pill every morning."
I don't know why this was not translated into Portuguese.
I've waited for the subtitle... no subtitle.
It means nothing. But I've noticed that. And also noticed that Post-Traumatic Stress disorder was not translated either.
Why?
I have no idea.
I'm just describing something that catch my attention.
It was terrible watching these young people, mostly from poor families.

And I've remembered this article:
"The use of drugs as weapons"
http://mondediplo.com/2007/08/12bioweapons

I don't have access to the English version.

But I don't doubt that this soldiers are not on antidepressants while on the front.

"The University of California scientists found that sevoflurane gas stopped patients remembering "emotive" images, New Scientist magazine reported.

The behavioral results show that 0.25% sevoflurane blocks emotional memory, and connectivity results demonstrate that this dose of sevoflurane suppresses the effective influence of the amygdala. Collectively, the findings support the hypothesis that the amygdala mediates memory modulation by demonstrating that suppressed amygdala effectiveness equates with a loss of emotional memory."

It was suggested that this gas could prevent PTSD.

There's something new on the front. This time not LSD.
And I believe that not only antidepressant.
Soldiers without pain and fearless...

What a wonderful world!
Oh Yeah!

Posted by: Ana at June 6, 2008 01:06 PM

Erik,
It's not only sedative as you can see.
This are my suspicions.
All I have are suspicions. I've already said that one day they will label me something else because of this pseudology fantasies of mine.

Philip,
I can't pay you with money. I hope raising these questions and sharing my researches and concerns can contribute with something.
Believe me I prefer not to write about it.
I rather keep it to myself and my writings. It hurts every time I have to revisit one of these.
Forgive me for the countless English mistakes.
I'm assassinating English grammar here. The number of prepositions I have used in the wrong way, on the wrong way... the wrong way...

Posted by: Ana at June 6, 2008 01:17 PM

The Bush crime family loves war. War is great for business. Remember Dubya's grandfather, Prescott Bush?

As director of NY bankers, Brown Brothers Harriman, Prescott was funding the Nazis, and at the very time that thousands of his fellow countrymen were forfeiting lives to safeguard our freedoms and liberties.

Like his grandson today, Prescott was a Quisling of the worse order.

Harrimans were convicted several times under the Trading with the Enemy Act.

Prescott and his fellow traitors should been tried at Nuremberg for their war crimes. Imagine what a difference a few more hangings back then would have made today.

For all the gory details of the wartime traitors, see Professor Antony Sutton's book, "Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler"

The Brits were just as bad. Sir Montagu Norman, governor of the Bank of England, no less, was a personal friend of Hitler's finance minister, Hjalmar Schacht. With the help of financiers like Max Warburg, they engineered the infamous economic austerity policy that helped usher in the military dictatorship of the Third Reich.

Back then, the corporate fascists of IG Farben were profiting from the slave labor camps of the Reich.

Today, the same grouping - the Synarchist International - run the PsychoPharm death industry, turning our children into mind-blown mental slaves for life.

Posted by: Sloopy Cowbell at June 6, 2008 05:29 PM

I have often heard it said that 20% of all homeless men living on the streets in Britain are ex-servicemen. Most of them are mentally disturbed because of the traumas they suffered through war.

Posted by: Sloopy Cowbell at June 6, 2008 05:34 PM

Ana,
Your English is fine. Really. It's a lot better than my Portuguese, for starters. But I wouldn't have even known it's not your native tongue had you not said something.
Thanks for your research. It does add value to the discussion. I didn't know about Prescott, for one.
Best wishes,
Sherry

Posted by: Sherry at June 6, 2008 08:43 PM

Trauma leaving an impression on you is normal. PTSD is a contrived load of shit. Why dive it a name? Why throw guesswork pharmacology at it? Why build a body of 'science' around it. Spend the money and the time providing these people psychotherapy, friends to talk it out, these people are hired killers volunteering for a life of fighting in political wars, and when they see the death, they get all traumatized, which is normal. There is no fucking pill for jealously, why would there be a pill for sorrow. There isn't! It's a guesswork pharmacology corporate baked billion dollar PR placebo chemistry set, and it must be stopped.


There's got to be something abnormal about anyone who goes into the volunteer military as a 'career'. Show me a real war. The last real war was the second world war, when our homes were actually threatened. Signing up to be a modern volunteer soldier to be at the president's whim for political wars for oil is a shameful life choice.

When these killers get home and are haunted by their nightmares of remembering shooting hot lead into innocent iraqis faces, they can burn in hell for I care.

Giving their regrets and nightmares a medical label is just a frigging sham. Perturbing their neurology with drowning it in whiskey or antidepressants is the same masking load of shit its one and the same.

Psychopharmaceutical complex sees plenty of lifelong gullible customers in the returning 'soldiers' / hired killers, and they are all fodder for this pathetic psychiatry trying to get credibility as legitimate science...

I couldn't care less about anyone who returns from a war that was unjustified. They weren't fighting for their country's freedom, or Iraqi freedom, its a shambolic mess. And America not learning the lesson of Vietnam just shows how pathetic the human race can be.

So dope them all up, fire up the ECT and DBS for all I care. These people gambled with their lives when they become volunteer hired killers for political wars, and they continue to gamble with their lives putting these guesswork 'meds' into their systems voluntarily.

It's just another market for them. What a sham, what a shame.

Posted by: Poe at June 7, 2008 03:54 AM

Sloopy,

I didn't know about Prescott. I don't know what politicians have in mind. All I know is that it seems that they are getting less and less concerned with people. We have a long discussion here.
I'm watching a documentary on Chernobyl. As I suspected (there I go again with my suspicions:) ) the story is much more appalling than it was reported on 1986 and "they" lied, they lied and they lied. Perhaps it will take another 20 years to know the real story.
And I'm sure that it will take at least 20 years to unfold part of the scandal we are all here trying hard to uncover.
Or it will happen like the benzodiazepines.
In 1986 they were not considered as addictive and were sold over the counter.
Prozac was launched and benzodiazepines are still being prescribed but now they are considered addictive and are sold with a warning.
Perhaps other drugs will be launched and only "the few" who were not happy enough to have benefits from "the old ones" will know.
Tricyclic antidepressants are also hard to withdraw, causes side effects and it's been on the market since 1960. SSRIs are the now considered the "new". It was told that side effects were mild and there was no withdrawal problems. How ironic!

I've found this yesterday and fortunately it's still online:
"the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has received a record number of complaints about the drug: 35,000 by 1996."

Joseph Wesbecker had been taking Prozac when he walked into his workplace, an Indianapolis printing plant, in September 1989, shot dead eight colleagues, wounded 12 and killed himself. Survivors and relatives of the dead took Lilly to court in 1994. They claimed that Wesbecker's violence was due to Prozac. The jury found that Prozac was not at fault.

Two years later, media pressure forced Lilly to admit that it had.....

http://www.breggin.com/bulletinprozac5.html


Sherry,

Thank you! It's good to know that you can understand what I'm writing.:)
What's happening is that I've searched a lot during 2005 and 2006.
I've stopped searching.
By that time I was appalled and could write easily on this subject without feeling what I'm feeling now.
I'm very sad reading that things are the same or even worse.
I'm getting too emotional and feeling extremely sad reading people writing withdrawal problems the same way:
"-It's so good I've found this site. I though it was just me." "-When will the brain zaps go away?" "-My doctor don't understand why I'm having these symptoms."
"-Hang on people! I've been there! It's hard but it will go away."
"-According to my experience you have to withdraw v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y!"
"-Read the "Prozac Backlash" or "The Antidepressant Solution!"

I didn't see the "-Don't they know anything? It was as if we don't exist."

I used to be angry. But I was full of hope. I've found an e-mail, yes I wrote messages to WHO, FDA, MHRA and I don't remember how many e-mails I wrote. I found one of them yesterday and started to laugh. Silly me!

"...The withdrawal effects are unbearable. And you find out that these drugs are powerful and are on the market not because they are good for your mental health. You find out that the USA Pharmacological Industry and some Associations like, oh my God, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Medical Association, American Medical Association's Council on Scientific Affairs, the University of California, the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, even Mr. Bush father who was once on the Eli-Lilly board, take part on a powerful consortium of medical-pharmaceutical self-interest groups.
These Associations, that are supposed to take care at least of American citizens, don’t even care if children are committing suicide."

This is part of one of this messages.

Gee! I have to stop.
I'm finding more and more data I collected and it's driving me crazy:

" Last year the FDA required Shire to update Adderall's label in the U.S. to warn that it should not be used in children or adults with structural cardiac abnormalities.

The FDA said it's too soon to tell if ADHD drugs really increase cardiovascular risk and that it was "pursuing additional means to better characterize the cardiovascular risks for all drug products approved for ADHD." Among the options, the FDA said, was long-term safety trials to look at cardiovascular risks."
It was on 2005 and is still online:

http://www.ahrp.org/infomail/05/06/29.php

Posted by: Ana at June 7, 2008 11:10 AM

Poe you rock! Accepting a psych label, your own or someone else's, is a crime against all that is decent, shambolic indeed!

Posted by: Sally at June 7, 2008 11:52 AM

Poe,
I agree with you about PTSD label.
But I believe we should ask these young people why they volunteered.
Blaming them is unfair.

Posted by: Ana at June 7, 2008 12:23 PM

Antidepressants, by enabling longer deployments, may actually be increasing the incidence of PTSD -- a very damaging condition. That's the big takeaway from the story.

And while there is no pill for jealousy, PTSD has a set course of symptoms that cause a great deal of misery and damage -- and it is treatable.

The treatment for PTSD is more psychological than psychiatric. It is not really a big pharma market.

PTSD exists. It is not a simple emotional reaction to trauma. It involves vivid, disorienting flashbacks and avoidance of any kind of stimulus -- including social contact.

Posted by: Kalea Chapman at June 8, 2008 07:37 AM

regarding the above comments:

One thing I offer to those who are jaded or suspicious of psychiatry is pay attention to the deeds of the provider, not just the words. There are good providers out there who treat people with real illnesses, and provide care in a multifactorial process: therapy, meds, and most important, promoting the idea of change to the patient. If you believe most if all psychiatric illness is a sham, then run, do not walk, to the nearest exit. Your rigidity and inflexibility is your problem; good luck finding sympathetic, supportive people to be in your corner. I see genuine people who are struggling with tangible problems who need help from unbiased, objective people with skills to provide such services.

It is not about drugs or "biochemical imbalances". It is about care. This site seems to dispell the myth there is a cure with a pill. Good for this blogger!

Check out the episode of Numbers when the Rob Morrow character is seeing a therapist who says to Morrow after asking "do I need a drug", and the therapist replies, "if you want to get better, take a pill, but if you want to get it right, fact the truth,"

Too many people aren't ready to face the truth. If you are, there are responsible docs out there who will work WITH you.

Posted by: therapyfirst at June 8, 2008 10:01 AM

As much as arguing with the fanatics is something I am rarely in the mood for, let's rumble.

"And while there is no pill for jealousy, PTSD has a set course of symptoms that cause a great deal of misery and damage -- and it is treatable."

You and your cohorts in the indoctrinated world of therapy choose to call a behavior or feeling a symptom. You appropriated this language from real medicine that deals in observable biological diseases with known etiologies and known treatment action that corrects known biological defect. I laugh when I hear this kind of language from a 'therapist' and don't 'listen', I laugh. And then I cry. It's just another example of your unearned authority and misappropriated right to speak on the topic of human distress. Which you have clearly seen fit as something that can be learned and mastered from a book. Which was your first and carnal mistake in life if you ask me.

You take a phenomena, called reaction to trauma, call it abnormal, give it a name, PTSD, a noun, an object, floating through the person's body and life, like cancer, sell it as just as tangible as cancer, just as 'diagnosable' as cancer and often times get into hysterics claiming it is just as 'deadly' as if some phantom aberration of the brain just suddenly appeared a few days after I shot my first iraqi civilian for instance. This is why people laugh at your qualifications. You spend a few years reading textbooks which indoctrinate you to simply 'get over the fact the basis is groundless and assumptive, theoretical and speculative, just never mind that, get over that and spend a life reading studies on the outcomes of people we label with these speculative diseases and prod with guesswork meds'.

It is everyone's problem that trauma and distress are now the purview of maniacal 'scientists' who look for 'symptoms' of a defective abnormal human being, rather than simply place yourself in the shoes of the man who has witnessed mass murder on the battlefield and try and stand with him in
solidarity and explain to him you could see yourself feeling the same way if you'd been traumatized so.

Why give it a name? Why? Why be divisive and preach OTHERNESS to people who are already feeling alienated and hurt and are coming home to a hostile public who mostly doesn't value the war they have just fought? Why teach helplessness, why ABUSE the unearned authority you have, and tell this man his brain is defective, and call into question in his own mind just how much he can rely on ever getting through it?

HOW can I get through this tough time (he asks himself) with a defective brain to rely on? Can you even rely on a defective brain? Of course not! Am I going to be there for my son if I remain this distressed for years? What will become of me? The shrinks say I have an incurable brain disease son. I'm gonna comply with the 'treatment' and hope for the best. Why is this happening to me? I've just been to war now I have an abnormal psychology, a mental illness. Wow. Gee. I get the short straws in life.

How in the fuck can you help when you are coming from this defeatist, COLD, DISTANCED, OTHERNESS, CLINICAL, JUDGEMENTAL, STANDPOINT? A standpoint of superiority. A eugenic standpoint even.

You can't. "It's treatable" you say. Oh goody gum drops! And you've got more than a checklist to prove I should have a primitive infant science of chemical mind rape sloshing around in my neurology daily through every synapse for life? You've got more than a checklist and a degree on the wall that says you read the necessary textbooks? No!?? You don't have more than that? "I've got an office and a business card and so and so board licensed me to practice what I know"

Ah, yeah, but you're asking me to put a chemical compound into my entire body, specifically designed to fundamentally restructure my neuromechanics and executive function. Can you please tell me what is happening to my brain if you say it is defective? I asked politely. No. I don't want to know what you 'think' is happening, nor what your trade union, the APA thinks is happening, I want to know exactly what I am doing to my brain before I do it to my brain. You say I have this disease and it is treatable. Please explain.

I suppose while you don't understand the neuromechanics of jealousy you fully understand the neuromechanics of my constant flashbacks to the moment when I shot hollow point bullets into the enemy's neck and watched his eyes meet mine for a second in agony and mortal fear as his lifeblood drained away, and how that rips at me at night as I see his mind scream 'why!!!' and I break out into a cold sweat and want to change the fact that I was there, and want to drink a fifth of vodka in the middle of the night whilst standing in my sweat soaked singlet crying with fridge door open?

You understand the neurology of that moment do you? With a college degree and some hubris you're gonna get out the DSM and tell me what my problem is and that it is 'treatable' and I am going to let you drug me with wanton guesswork? Is that how this is gonna work? Ok what time next week.

"The treatment for PTSD is more psychological than psychiatric. It is not really a big pharma market."


Wrong. Psychiatric treatment is more psychological than medical. And psychological treatment is more psychiatric than it should be.

Massive fail there. And even you were right, please enlighten me as to what the 'science' of psychology has unearthed in its 'research' to help me with my combat nightmares. I'm on tenterhooks. Maybe who knows, giving me a permanent label that disempowers me, stigmatizes me for life, and says I am abnormal and defective will go some way to beginning the healing process.

"PTSD exists. It is not a simple emotional reaction to trauma. It involves vivid, disorienting flashbacks and avoidance of any kind of stimulus -- including social contact. "

"It involves" No wrong. Trauma involves... trauma involves vivid flashbacks. Not 'it', when your 'it' is the noun you and your trade union made up. And PTSD exists, sure. But not on the autopsy table, not on the test results of any objective medical diagnostic scenario. It exists in your filthy bible the DSM, and exists in your head, the collective heads of all the shrinks, all the people who have been told by the shrinks they have it, and the public who read the media who in turn trust the experts are speaking the truth and are reasonable and not indoctrinated OUT OF THE PARK!!!!!!!!!!!!

The main problem. Where in the fuck did this world get so many apparently intelligent people, who can get into college, who come out as mental health professionals willing to take so much on faith. Where did that disorder come from? Why is there generation after generation of distilled lies and hubris coming out of mental health as a sector. The answer my friends is rote learning, anyone can rote learn. Make a mistake in the 50s, base the whole science around it, base the whole prestige and legitimacy of the field around it, and you just watch the next three generations distill it and market it to the world and fool themselves in the process as well as the media, the governments, and most harmfully of all, the poor people who come to them at their lowest hour, and have the shrinks turn it into their lowest decade.

If you're a vet reading this... You're not abnormal. I'd be fucked up after taking lives and seeing my buddies bleed too. You had a noble ideal joining the volunteer army. Just maybe next time, remember, if there was a real ground war, where the homeland was threatened, I would not ask you to fight for me, I would join up if my family and my own life were threatened by an invader. I will not be part of a political contrived war in Iraq, and I did not ask you to. The worst president in history asked you to ok. Choices are made in life. You saw the combat, you cannot change it now. The public doesn't hate you, it understands your motives at the time were what you believed in. You are not dead. You are still alive. That is what you need to remember. Every moment spent thinking about the past, will rob moments from you future and that of your family's. You're not a birth defect. You're not out of order. You're not mentally ill. You're a healthy man, with a healthy fit body and brain, whom doctors cannot place test results of showing you are brain defect, so you will work through it, return to the remaining years of your life and find a new career or something constructive.

Or you can get lifelong disability payment and sit in a trailer and numb yourself out on alchohol and psych meds. And die a fat lonely old man who the world saw as a 'crazy vet'... choice is yours. Mental health has a cancer in the modern world. It's run by relentless ideologues. You ought to consider yourself warned.


I pity anyone experiencing trauma in our society when it will endlessly be conflated and confected into some god awful ridiculous worthy of ridicule 'science' of guesswork, lies, arrogance, harm, misleading hubris, psychobabble, harm, more harm, dressed up as help.

There is a cancer on the presidency. There usually is every decade.

But there is a cancer on the mental health system. The sheer name of this system is even one of its millions of problems. Human distress, is now unhealthy. If you are distressed, you're not fucking normal. Any distress, that ever happens to you, go see someone who has spent a couple of years reading textbooks at college about abnormal people, because you are now an abnormal person.

Therapists, with stock standard training, bereft of understanding, replete with hubris that will come on here and drop the party line are a dime a dozen. There's nothing remarkable about an unreformable mental health ideologue. The world is full of them. If it wasn't, we would have had positive reform by now. Instead the cancer grows exponentially, as cancers will. Graduation day pumps out some more tumors for us. Rote learners convinced they have chosen wisely, specialized in a career in the cutting edge, the final frontier, get to far in, convince themselves they don't need to worry their discipline isn't founded on any hard understanding, they can poke around in the lives of millions and study the outcomes later, trial and error, and we will just go on trusting the experts, because we all got forced to go to social engineering factories called 'schools' and we defer to authority on everything, division of labor, even when our neurology is at stake and the expert has nothing but a handful of beans to grow a magic serotonin stalk.

The disciplines charged with responsibility of dealing with human distress and delusion, themselves are irrevocably mired in delusion, and cause UNTOLD human distress.

Do you honestly think there would be a whole movement of people this angry with you if you weren't doing something wrong.

Only reason the rest aren't angry with you is because they are either:

To scared, weak, trusting and disabled by being drugged to think it through and get to the truth

Ignorant sheep, willing to defer to authority at ANY COST INCLUDING MY LIFE AND THEIRS, indoctrinated to become fanatical psych followers even in the face of a paucity of evidence the size of space.

Victims of the same indoctrination school/college party line training course that turned you from a harmless teen into an adult who chose the career of fucking with people heads with guesswork.

I'm totally done for a while. Mental health in this country is a mess and its not due to any defective brains popping off. Boy is it a mess. Rote learners straddling a pile of studies hundreds of miles high all the way up to space... yet you could fill space with amount of guesswork, harm, hubris, and evil that is created and pushed by the mental health pros of this world.

Posted by: Poe at June 8, 2008 03:33 PM

The big issue with the the term PTSD is that it appeared so that the disease were treated by psychiatry.
There's no pill that can cure "neurosis" the old and good neurosis.
As far as therapy is concerned it's appalling that in USA it became, on public opinion, deeply tied with psychiatry.
People don't know the difference between what is the work of a psychologist and of a psychiatrist.
To make things more confusing there are therapies EMDR, CBT, AT and others that are letting people down.
Therapy is not an easy thing. There's no miracle pill and there's no miracle therapy.
It's a hard job and if the person is waiting for salvation it's better reading self-help books.

Posted by: Ana at June 8, 2008 03:47 PM


Cigarettes are the ultimate commodity on the ward. When those who were blessed with the privelege of going to the shop with the nurses were taking orders, almost everybody would be counting out their last pennies and asking for cigarettes. In the smoking room, you light up and suddenly you’re surrounded by a gaggle of gasping green faces, subtley crowbarring ciggies from your packet. When people visited you, you asked for something to read and cigarettes.

http://thesecretlifeofamanicdepressive.wordpress.com/posts-i-want-you-to-read/

This is from Seaneen a 21 years old woman who is trying hard to make same sense understanding her illness and finding any relief. She writes brilliantly and expresses her feelings, acts, ideas and her views on what she thinks having a maniac-depressive condition means that gather lots of people telling her they could realize some of their own experiences while reading some of her posts.
She is not on therapy because it's expansive.

I took this excerpt because of the similarity that I see on the two wards I visit here in my city in Brazil and the data other people give me regarding the “smoking problem”.

I just want to say that I'm Brazilian but I'm not a spokeswoman of all Brazilians.
I did wrong saying "In Brazil this... In Brazil that."
I'm sorry.
I'm expressing my personal views.

Posted by: Ana at June 8, 2008 03:54 PM

I have learned from being involved at previous sites that focus on mental health issues that the longer the rant, the less I want to read it (from personal experience as much as a reader). Shakespeare had a valuable quote when he wrote, "full of sound and fury, signifying nothing". If you do not believe in the practice of mental health care, fine, just say that and share an experience or a vignette of someone's struggle to receive decent care. If you think you can just shout one down and win by the number of words you write, think again.

Yes, there are charlatans, frauds, and perhaps a bit harsh, but evil people who claim to be health care providers who do nothing less than prey or mislead patients and the public. But if you overgeneralize and include caring people like me in tirades, you will be challenged.
I'm watching out for those whose only agenda is to demean and devalue a care intervention. If you are a Scientologist, fuck you! Yeah, that is beyond harsh, but I know that group's agenda, and there is no more room for niceties. If you have been mislead by bad example, please seek out a new provider who could be referred by one of value to you who has benefitted from good care. If you are part of a mob mentality, seek the truth, not someone's devious agenda. If you just don't believe, just move on.

For what it is worth to readers, I'm sorry you have been burned as a patient or an interested party to a patient. Mental health care has its place, it just needs a louder voice from those who care and want to preserve that caring role.

Or, have I misread the intent of this blogger?

by a psychiatrist of 15 years

Posted by: therapyfirst at June 8, 2008 05:27 PM

Some good self help books...

Mad In America by Robert Whitaker

Making us Crazy by Kirk and Hutchins

Toxic Psychiatry by Peter Breggin

The Gene Illusion by Jay Joseph

Dying for a Cure by Rebekah Beddoe

On Education (1762) by Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Psychiatric Slavery by Thomas Szasz

This blog

The documents and manifestos available at the Jeffrey S Poland website, google Jeffrey Poland and you'll see the best schizophrenia paper in the history of man.

Generation Rx by someone can't remember but there is a film of it coming out in two months youtube search for the trailer

While you're at youtube check out Dr. John Breeding's videos

March of the Zealots
http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/zealots.htm

A fight to Be by Ron Bassman

Anything from Alice Miller, the last original psychologist to be born in the history of man

For further self help travel to unpopulated areas and weird holiday destinations like the Faroe Islands and see unadulterated nature and unadulterated people. Go to the island of Dominica and build a house and live on the cheap with servants for 150 grand.

Get as far away from Harvard as you can.

Read the horror stories (strike that 'best practice') at psychdiagnosis.net

Read some philosophy from age old thinkers for free online. Get used to screen reading. It is the future.

Or you crack your noodle open like a watermelon for some ideologue shrink and invite him to do a poo in it.


Another interesting topic to grow to understand is 'endocrine disruptors'. If you go and search this out, you'll see what our brilliant scientific age has done to our hormones and the body burden of chemicals found in 'pristine' arctic polar bears, who live in water with parts per billion of pissed out contraceptive pill from millions of women's toilet water. And not to mention Prozac. Adding up to make frogs come out with a sweet little condition called micropenis, which may be coming our way soon... all because of the reliance on plastics. Hell for all science knows your laptop keyboard could be leaching phthalates into your mucous membranes right now giving you a slow burn cancer.

Forget climate. What about body burden. Why isn't anyone talking about that? Because they are all content to poison us and our kids while making us feel guilty for turning on an electric light.


Posted by: Poe at June 8, 2008 05:35 PM

Therapyfirst,

I comment here but don't control the intent of this blog. You seem defensive about therapy. As you know, getting mental health care from a paid professional is like prostitution, not quite the real thing, though I'm speculating, having never paid for sex, but when you pay for compassion and understanding, it just ain't compassion and understanding. Mine is a minority view here. I think most folks who post here would agree with you.

And yet look at your behavior, your deeds. You write, "If you believe most if all psychiatric illness is a sham, then run, do not walk, to the nearest exit. Your rigidity and inflexibility is your problem; good luck finding sympathetic, supportive people to be in your corner." In other words, if you disagree with me, you are wrong, I don't want to hear it, shut up and leave. Where's your empathy, Mr. Therapist, your decency? Aren't you being rigid and inflexible? But it's okay when you exhibit the behaviors you condemn in others because you're a special member of a helper class. Pretty grandiose there dude. You sound like a controlling sadist, but then you are a pshrink. And then you write, "the longer the rant, the less I want to read id." D*ckhead! Do you apply this same rule to your clients, do you not listen the ones who are talking too passionately? I guess not, just kick them and out and "save" the quiet, obedient ones, unless of course the ranty folks have fatter pockets.

And you dare quote Shakespeare. As, among other things, an English major, brutalized by the functional illiteracy of purported therapists, I'll tell you this, you didn't read the whole play. If sound and fury signify nothing to you, you damn sure know nothing about human suffering and are causing a good bit of it.

Posted by: Sally at June 9, 2008 01:53 AM

therapyfirst ,
You are so right!
It's not only on mental health. It's hard to have a good discussion on the WWW.
But I've noticed that on mental health sites it's harder for there's no discussion people don't exchange ideas. There are statements and communications.

There's too much "sound and fury", the focus is lost and real issues are put aside.

the longer the rant, the less I want to read it (from personal experience as much as a reader).

I'm selecting what to read. By taking a glimpse on comments now I only read those that will bring me enlightenment and are really concerned in promoting mental health.

There's no time to loose.

Mental health care has its place, it just needs a louder voice from those who care and want to preserve that caring role.

That's the point.

Could you explain to me why psychiatry and psychology are so connected?
I've been on therapy for 20 years. Yes! It was a long road but I had the lucky to find the right person.
Thank you

Posted by: Ana at June 9, 2008 02:30 AM

Oh look the psychiatrist of 15 years is calling me a scientologist and saying fuck you to me and ridiculing the length of my posts. Last time I looked the comment text box allows for me to speak as long as I wish.

You call what you do for fifteen years 'care'? It takes a special kind of person to take people suffering human distress with electrodes. Enough said.

You want a short vignette? Busy are you? Busy writing guesswork scripts for guesswork pharmacology for people whom you have no clear picture of any proven biological defect. I don't care for your suggestion to 'move on'. In fact I will dedicate my life to demeaning and devaluing your 'care interventions' because they cause nothing but harm and are founded in dogmatic ideology.

I'm no scientologist. But I guarantee you this, if someone were to practice scientology for 15 years they would destroy less lives than you no doubt have contributed to destroying in your 15 years as a member of your profession which is in itself, a faith based cult.

You are a cult member, 15 years deep. The fact that you use words like 'if you don't believe in mental health care move on' is telling...

Studies of religious, political, and other cults have identified a number of key steps in this type of coercive persuasion:[27]

1. People are put in physically or emotionally distressing situations;
2. Their problems are reduced to one simple explanation, which is repeatedly emphasized;
3. They receive unconditional love, acceptance, and attention from a charismatic leader;
4. They get a new identity based on the group;
5. They are subject to entrapment (isolation from friends, relatives, and the mainstream culture) and their access to information is severely controlled

You're an indoctrinated ideologue. And to admit freely you're a psychiatrist for 15 years, rather than bolster your credibility, merely shows me the blood on your hands.

Everything you've ever done as a psychiatrist is full of sound and fury and signifying nothing.

Have a nice day. If you don't like long posts, which is normal for a mindless rote learner used to a life of reductionism like yourself, you want a quick vignette from a pharma rep and you're on your way right?... If you don't like long posts don't practice an evil profession that destroys lives, bodies, and families. Simple as that.

Since you people can't kick off a post without either a Shakespeare quote or a comparison to hard medicine diseases like cholera, and scientology ad hominem, here is quote for you...

A quote which colors your every professional action, which I hope realize on your deathbed as an old man filled with regret....

"Of all tyrannies a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. "

CS Lewis.

Posted by: Poe at June 9, 2008 06:33 AM

Mr Poe:
glad you read my posting. Thanks for the validation.

Posted by: therapyfirst at June 9, 2008 10:11 AM

Ana:
I'll take a shot at answering your question about the difference between psychology and psychiatry, as best I can.

Psychologists are doctorates trained in University settings generally in the field of psychology and most are trained in various elements of academic and clinical interventions.
In my opinion, psychologists are as good if not better at psychotherapy if they practice a paradigm they are comfortable and well trained at providing. Psychiatry is a medical discipline that begins with a medical training and then goes on into a residency that provides psychological and further medical interventions. Most psychiatrists have some backround in psychology prior to starting medical school, as did I, so the residency experience solidifies the educational foundation.

Personally, I hope your experiences with therapy have been more positive than negative, and if you have to reexplore issues, go back and you'll probably get into it easier than what you had to do in prior courses.

on a separate note, it is interesting that Sally and Poe took my above comments personally. I am not here to practice therapy, as I abhor the concept that therapy can occur over the internet.

I would offer this premise to either or both of you if interested:
If you work in a field you have dedicated 15 years of your post high school education to being considered a professional and an expert, only to have people who have little to no experience in said field tell others with an air of authority your work is a fraud and toxic to the community, get back to me how you would react. Scientology is not a respectable religion, nor any that attacks others who do not toe the line to their rigid and inflexible rhetoric. Their concerted effort to demonize my field is at least scandalous, if not immoral. Read the Rolling Stone expose in the April 2006 or 07 issue to get what I felt was a decent examination of their agenda and exploits.

I appreciate the owner of this blog allowing this debate to be aired. Other blogs I have written to seem to believe censorship is protective; slander is unacceptable, that I agree, but difference of opinion is what makes this culture work to a fair degree. In my office, if you tell me the sky is green, I'll be baffled, but I wouldn't tell you that you are wrong. I would just hope your belief gives you faith and hope. Isn't that what life is about?

Crap, now I've ranted. Guilty as charged.

Posted by: therapyfirst at June 9, 2008 10:41 AM

hey TF! Great to see you here! Keep on commenting! rants and all! You're a good example of a provider who wants the best for patients, with personal integrity, and your voice needs to be heard. This is one forum it will be (and won't be deleted!):)
live,love, learn!
Stephany

Posted by: Stephany at June 9, 2008 11:16 AM

Stephany:
Go to Carlat's blog, maybe after 9PM eastern and check out the comments section for today's posting: I can't believe he wrote "I'll give them the benefit of the doubt" regarding this issue with Biederman et al from yesterday. He writes in the commentary about innocent until proven quilty, which is technically right, but come on, $4mil plus between these 3 guys!?

You'll see he did print my comment at least.

I look forward to writing here, if of value.

Posted by: therapyfirst at June 9, 2008 12:45 PM

Gee!
I'm in the middle of the battlefield one more time!

Poe,
Please! I believe you have your points. You have good points. But you write with so much anger that it's almost impossible to pay attention on your contribution.
I understand your views. I understand but I believe you should try to understand and discuss with others.
It seems you are fighting the world.


Let's forget the Scientology stuff, please!
There are no scientologists here!
We have already crossed the line that people who are critical of the psychiatry are called this or that!

I believe we must know each other better to have a good discussion.

therapyfirst,

I know the difference between psychiatry and psychology very well.
What I don't understand is why therapy is being put together with psychiatry in USA?
I can't understand discussing medication during your time with your therapist.
Is it possible to medicate, which requires a certain kind of knowledge, and make therapy, which is a total different approach?
I've knew too psychoterapists who medicated. They fail in both attempts.
One of them was responsible for the wrong medication that led me to become a psychiatrist patient when the first, who was only a psychiatrist was good enough to give me a benzo - unfortunately the most addictive- and told me to go to therapy for I didn't need to be on any drug. But this is another story.

I did psychotherapy. Freud?
Included. She, as many good psychoanalysts we have here, have studied hard others. But not these people who mix Lacan, Winnicott, Melanie Klein, Ferenczy, with a dash of Deleuze and to spice it all Foucault and Guatarri. LOL

The most important. I did the job with her.
Many critics I see of people who feel disappointed with therapy is because they say they are told to do this or that.
This is not therapy!
There are other critics.

Most psychiatrists have some backround in psychology prior to starting medical school, as did I, so the residency experience solidifies the educational foundation.

This is exactly what I fear:
"same background in psychology"

According to my experience and the experience I see of other people, no psychiatrist was capable of doing good psychology.
As a matter of fact psychologists are letting people down here.
And for what I've been reading it's not very different in other places.

I abhor the concept that therapy can occur over the internet.

Sure! But you have to compromise. Psychiatry is all over the WWW kingdom trying hard to sell drugs.


What I see in this thread is:

Aren't we are all trying to know what is the best for mental health?

For my part I'm trying this moment hard to find the right questions to be made.
There are too many things being discussed on this blog!

I believe that we should unite our efforts and TRY trust each other.
At least try to make a discussion instead of a battlefield.

Otherwise we are wasting our time, it took me half an hour to write all of these... brilliant remarks! LOL.
I believe you all have spent some time typing the keyboard.

So it's not a metaphor about wasting time.
I rather read a book or do something better than repeat myself and try to find some sense.

Posted by: Ana at June 9, 2008 12:51 PM

I never saw a psychiatrist on any blog trying to discuss.
I believe we should compromise!

No matter how many philosophers we read, how many quotations we have...
when the goddamn mania appears... there we go to the first psychiatrist.

If we can rely on someone! If we only knew that someday we would need a psychiatrist!

I'll say once again:

Take a look at the blog:

http://thesecretlifeofamanicdepressive.wordpress.com/

This girl has something to share!

Posted by: Ana at June 9, 2008 01:00 PM

Gee!

I'm spending so many time searching here and there and reading so much in English, wathing BBC and seeing so many stuffs in English that I just said "-I'm sorry!" to my neighbor!
I went to put the garbage on the... how to you say that?
I went to put my garbage on the building garbage, that's what I mean... LOL You understood?
That hole on the wall with a little door where you introduce your garbage.
I see you have it too.
At least I see it on movies! It's exactly the same here. :)

I like the one on the movie "Frankie and Johnie"!

I'll open a Blog!

Don't be afraid Philip!
I'm just feeling homeless in the blogsphere.

I'll make two posts just to introduce myself and spare others people time trying to know who am I, what am I here for and so on.
And I also can put my great "findings" there instead of using your place.

Posted by: Ana at June 9, 2008 01:23 PM

TF- I've written a post with Dr.F's letter showcased...that letter says it all re: the Biederman scandal.
(sorry to go off topic here)

Posted by: Stephany at June 9, 2008 01:45 PM

Thank you Stephany.
Your post linked me to Psychiatrist's blogs.
I'm so focus on patients that I didn't know about them.

Posted by: Ana at June 9, 2008 03:42 PM

Therapyfirst,

Almost all groups (but especially those trying to retain/increase their personal power) "attack others who do not toe the line to their rigid and inflexible rhetoric". Virtually every major religion would fall to this rubric.

I think those of us who have been harmed by psychiatry feel a certain obligation to warn others. All you're seeing is the same passion that anyone who is trying to prevent a great harm would do. My experiences with psychiatry have involved involuntary incarceration and forced drugging. I call it rape. There is no other term that adequately describes the experience. I only survived and regained my freedom through guile and deception.

"If you believe most if all psychiatric illness is a sham, then run, do not walk, to the nearest exit" is ultimately the right thing to do, but you must obviously realise that to victim of psychiatric rape this does sound a bit trite - one has to be able to leave first...

Posted by: Paul at June 9, 2008 03:51 PM

Dr. Therapyfirst,

Your recent post is so perfectly illustrative of a couple of the many problems with psychiatry/psychology/mental health for profit, that I'm compelled to point them out.

First, while I have no personal knowledge of either you or Poe, assuming your reports of having been a practicing pshrink for 15 years are true and his report of having been brutalized by pshrinks is true (an assumption which you seem to buy admitting that there are some serious problems in your "profession"), when you read both my and Poe (and perhaps others) somewhat harsh critiques of psychiatry, you respond with verbal violence writing, "If you believe most if all psychiatric illness is a sham, then run, do not walk, to the nearest exit. Your rigidity and inflexibility is your problem; good luck finding sympathetic, supportive people to be in your corner."

Then you go further and subsequently post that "it is interesting that Sally and Poe took my above comments personally. I am not here to practice therapy," implying that in spite of the fact that you acknowledge that we've been brutalized by your "profession," our critique of it is a symptom of some psychiatric disorder and then in the typical and frankly evil manner of a psychiatrist, you describe your violent angry words as not symptomatic of some genetic brain disorder but instead an understandable aberration of a decent and reasonable person and thus write: "I would offer this premise to either or both of you if interested:If you work in a field you have dedicated 15 years of your post high school education to being considered a professional and an expert, only to have people who have little to no experience in said field tell others with an air of authority your work is a fraud and toxic to the community, get back to me how you would react." Indeed why is it that your unreasonable reaction is understandable and sane, and our reactions, even if you perceive them to be unreasonable, indicate that we need not just therapy but off line therapy from you?

And you leave us with this precious nugget: "In my office, if you tell me the sky is green, I'll be baffled, but I wouldn't tell you that you are wrong. I would just hope your belief gives you faith and hope. Isn't that what life is about?" It intrigues me that you seem to be honestly reporting your experience and really not seeing how screwed up it is (Fuller Torrey discusses that sort of thing a lot, lucky for you, I disagree with him). When a patient reports to a psychiatrist that the sky is green, what she's paying the psychiatrist is to tell her that, if it's the case, the psychiatrist doesn't see the sky as green but instead sees it as blue, and that the psychiatrist thinks that many other people share his perception. If the pshrink just silently implies agreement, s/he's harming the "patient." Can you see how?

Posted by: Sally at June 9, 2008 05:25 PM

Paul,

Wow, I missed the irony you picked up on in Therpyfirst's medical order that: "If you believe most if all psychiatric illness is a sham, then run, do not walk, to the nearest exit."

You are right. Psychiatric patients are not allowed to leave without the permission of their psychiatrists who diagnose them as mentally ill for not leaving even though they can't leave because their psychiatrist will not give them permission too.

Therapyfirst, your profession's abuse of me has left me virtually penniless, so I'm going to take some generic ibuprofen for my dental pain because I can't afford a dentist. Why don't you, Mr. 15 years as a practicing pshrink have a nice glass of scotch and count your money.

Posted by: Sally at June 9, 2008 06:08 PM

ah, Sally...trust me, don't take TF down.

Posted by: Stephany at June 9, 2008 06:57 PM

It is truly sad to read so much pain and hurt in the above comments. I have met some of the bastards who have done irresponsible, incompetent, and probably evil things that the above submissions hint of. What I hope you will try to absorb from my submissions to this site is that not all psychiatrists are bastards. Some doctors truly embrace and practice the Hippocratic Oath that preaches for me two very important principles: first, do no harm, and second, go from least to most invasive. What I would like to try to offer through my involvement at this site is reveal some insights and ideas how to maintain function in what is sadly a more dysfunctional world of late due to many causes: politics, religion, cultures, and for all of us, family inputs that are not perfect, and for too many, just plain wrong at times.

One of my favorite lines from a movie, Parenthood, is when the Keanu Reeves character says to his girlfriend's mother, "you know, you need a license to have a dog, to drive a car, you even need a license to catch a fish, but they'll let any butt reaming asshole be a parent." It speaks volumes to me that we as a society have a lot to learn to encourage and nuture healthy parenting. That's not the only dynamic to what is behind mental health struggles, but it can be an important one if not examined.

What I sense is going to be an ongoing "agree to disagree" premise between me and several of you who frequent this site is we'll hopefully learn to respect each other's unique perspectives to the mental health experience. I'm not here to change anyone; I hope to just provide one opinion that might maintain hope and faith. For those who hate what I am simply because of my professional title, then that's your problem, not mine. One thing about my style you will learn is I am honest and direct. That will not change, because it works for me, and it seems to work for the patients I treat and have treated who want to feel and be better than they were previously. When I am wrong, note the WHEN, I will come to note it and correct it. When I am right, and the debate has been exhausted, I will hope others will give pause and reflection as well.

If this site is trying to right some serious wrongs in my field, it won't be too successful with hate. I've been there, and I found out that path is dark, narrow, and dead ends fairly abruptly. I'm here because I feel this site has much promise, and I will offer what I know to hopefully aid in righting these wrongs.

For now, wrong #1 is biochemical imbalance is the biggest sham in my field. Drugs don't do it by in large for any illness, but at times medication can be a stimulus for the change that begets change. But that is the sell to the wary and reluctant: you have to believe it is worth the try, 'cause that's what it is, an attempt.

I've said enough for now. I'll offer more as I feel it is worthwhile. For those who feel I am of value or interest, thanks. For those who don't, oh well.

Posted by: therapyfirst at June 9, 2008 07:24 PM

The 15 year shrinks says 'how would I feel' if someone denigrated his grand efforts in training himself to become some kind of 'expert'.

Well you should be feeling like you wasted your time. Because you did. You might have bought a ticket to exploit people for a high income, but you don't possess a single tool to help anyone in distress. In fact you're hamstrung by your disease model indoctrination reeducation camp cambodia style training that you go through, you're given tools to fuck people up beyond recognition when they come to you for help.

How do you think the average psych patient who loses years of their life feels that their initial human distress has been blown way out proportion by your ideology and dogma, and they've been unethically convinced they have an incurable brain disease for life, and are genetic pariahs, ALL WITH NO EVIDENCE.

The people who become hypervigilant neurotics pathologizing their every behavior and turning them into subhuman untrusted animals who when people interact with them they ask 'is this the person talking, or the disease'....

I'd call that a fuck up. You fuck people up. And we'd be better off if you'd decided to become a plumber. Every psych training, years at college, fucking waste of time if you're just gonna come out and fuck people up.

You've got nothing. Bunch of contrived labels, psychobabble, and guesswork meds. And get used to us. Because I ain't going away. And I can tell you, with your bullshit 'diagnoses' on the rise, and the millions of kids brains your profession professionally rapes.... These kids are gonna get just as angry as me when they grow up... and there will be a movement to shut you down.

Telling me to 'move on' is like telling a slave 200 years ago to move on. Your ideology driven, faith based pseudoscience of a profession, is a bull in a china shop, a cancer on society. Psychiatry has done more harm than any other peacetime profession. You are hated. Your profession is hated. And it is because you destroy lives and families, and futures.

You've got nothing. I couldn't care less if you spend 40 years learning how to dole out guesswork meds and needlessly medicalize human distress. You're not a doctor, you are a pretender, as are all your colleagues. Every dollar you've ever earned was paid for with the blood of my fellow pharmacaust victims. Your kind needs to be wiped out for the good of mankind.

How dare you quote shakespeare. You're not a doctor. Some rampant misguided ideology that misleads the globe called you a Dr, but you do nothing but harm. I wonder how many hundreds of thousands of thousands of dollars you earned while I needlessly languished in iatrogenic disability for years.

It's not about finding another therapist you fool. The problem is, you smarmy do gooder fools decide to go to college to become versed in 'treating' human distress. And every one of you receives the same contrived faith based body of bullshit guesswork 'science' in college, and comes out and presumes to tell ME and all of us, what madness is and what it fucking isn't.

You haven't got a fucking clue. How dare you even attempt to lord your bullshit credentials over me or anyone. They aren't worth the paper they are written on, nor is any bullshit script for any guesswork pharma "medicine" you dole out on a daily basis. In fact it is one of my small consolations in life that I can know full well in my heart that all you shrinks have wasted your lives, shiny cars and incomes aside, you've lived and died having made the planet worse.

It takes a special kind of person to tell a human being who comes to you distressed that they have a fucking brain disease, and just heap with a shovel more problems and distress, which is what you all do you hubristic animals!

You all need to sent to an island where you are force fed neuroleptics until you look like Michael J Fox. Nothing can save you if there is a god... nothing. Convince yourself you are a fit and proper person providing 'care' all you like.

In 300 years, after millions more die, your profession will be looked at as one of the darkest mistakes ever made by humanity.


Posted by: Poe at June 9, 2008 07:50 PM

TherapyFirst,

It's good you're here. Let's see if you can actually agree to disagree without patronizing. It's scary how well intentioned you are. You have a point that parenting is not always good, but this has always been the case. No parent is 100% perfect, and it stands to reason no parent is 100% imperfect (unless they're also a psychiatrist, hah, a little joke). You seem confident that anyone who thinks all psychiatry and psychology is bad is at the very least mentally ill and/or a Scientologist. Troubling.

I'd recommend you be a little more aware of your own limits. Your training doesn't make you any more compassionate or perceptive than anyone else, I say tactfully understating.

You write: "For those who hate what I am simply because of my professional title, then that's your problem, not mine. One thing about my style you will learn is I am honest and direct."

Your assumption that I hate you is insulting as due to the wrongs visited on me by your profession, I spend every day working not to be destroyed by hate, and do so quite well, but still you should take responsibility for the actions of those in your profession, actions which are worthy of hate. And as I'm sure you learned in pshrink school, when someone tells you they are honest and direct, well...still, it's good to have you here, the pshrink who thinks he's helping people with therapy and no meds perspective is a vocal one so it's necessary to address, imuho.

Posted by: Sally at June 10, 2008 02:47 AM

Sally:

First of all, thank you for reading what I offer. And I am glad to participate if it is of value to some. Hey, if it stimulates healthy debate and difference of opinion, that's cool too. But, respectful debate is what I will engage in, not hate.

Experience is perspective, to some degree at least. Two people can witness an accident and give two different versions, depending not only where they were when it happened, but who was involved, where it occurred, and perhaps numerous other factors. Does that mean one is right and the other wrong if the versions differ?

Maybe. Maybe not.

My point: Two patients can go to the same psychiatrist and walk out with two reactions. Patient 1 could say, "I agree with him/her and will try the treatment recommendation." Patient 2 might say, "that doc is a bastard, he/she doesn't know what the hell he/she is saying." Yet the doctor could have said the exact same thing to both patients. Why the difference?
past experiences, expectations, the doctor's diagnostic impression, the treatment recommendation, something else--the color of the doc's shirt, the pictures on the wall, the way the room was laid out. People are individuals. The beauty of my field is it is gray, and you as a doctor need to feel out the shade in front of you and tailor the diagnosis and treatment options based on what that shade says to you.

That is what is error #2: the cookie cutter approach. One size does not fit all.

By the way, to be as fair as I possibly can to Mr Poe, I can't in good faith read your writings if they are going to be as hostile as they appear to me. I feel my above comment Sally alludes to is how I react to your comments: If you hate me, and that is how you come across, that is your issue, not mine.

Honesty and directness are not easy. that is why some patients walk out and say what Patient 2 said above. My interpretation may be wrong. But if they don't return to reveal more information, we'll never know. Because in the end, isn't that why most people go to a psychiatrist, because what is going on now is not working?

Again, just an opinion.

Posted by: therapyfirst at June 10, 2008 09:14 AM

Therapyfirst says "Patient 1 could say, "I agree with him/her and will try the treatment recommendation." Patient 2 might say, "that doc is a bastard, he/she doesn't know what the hell he/she is saying." Yet the doctor could have said the exact same thing to both patients. Why the difference?
past experiences, expectations, the doctor's diagnostic impression, the treatment recommendation, something else--the color of the doc's shirt, the pictures on the wall, the way the room was laid out."

Diagnostic impression? Ha! Yeah shrinks do a good impression of a doctor!

How about they walk out because you are telling them to perturb their neurology, the seat of the very self, with blatant speculation and guesswork?

How about the fact that you are no doubt not informing them of the dangerousness of the drugs.

How about walking out because a psycho with a checklist is telling you to end your family line because you have a 'brain disease'?

How about the fact that someone is either going to be scared shitless of what you tell them they 'have' and comply... or see you as an absurd aberration of all that is humanistic and reasonable about mankind and walk out in disgust.

The color of your shirt? Are kidding me? What about the color of your money? Blood red.

You people honestly consider yourselves 'tailors' of 'treatment options' don't you? It makes me sick. The justice system protects you as you ride roughshod over peoples lives without a clue what is going on their brains, masquerading as 'brain doctors'.

Write yourself a script for some thorazine and take it for a couple of months and tell me how you feel.

You people don't have a clue. You seriously think someone walks out of your office because they can't handle the 'truth and directness' of what you are saying.

If the universe ever gave you even a glimpse of the truth of your actions and their consequences, you'd have to be restrained from jumping under the nearest train. You might not be inherently evil, innately evil, born evil, I don't think you are. But I hate your profession, its training, its extralegal power, its hubris, its 'research', its lies, and I will hate it until the day I die. This is both our problems. And one thing is for sure, this problem came into my life out of the mouth of one of your kind.

And wrong, most people go see a psychiatrist because your profession is blessed to live in the age of mindless biological determinism in the wider society, and blessed to be very profitable for Big Pharma, and blessed to have the ear of government, and blessed to be able to experiment on coerced humans, and blessed to have billions to spend on tv ads, and blessed to be written into the tv dramas and movies, and blessed to be considered objective enough for the state to destroy peoples bodies with drugs, but subjective enough to avoid malpractice for the misdiagnoses and false diagnoses you make every day, smearing people's good names for life, and destroying people's self determination and confidence in a future for themselves, it is blessed to be in control of the spin and the message, it is blessed that you mainly intimidate and destroy the brains of your long term patients so they cannot participate in activism to shut you down, it is blessed that families pass down the generations that you are the place to go to for human distress problems....

That is why someone walks through your door. If they knew that door was the most dangerous door they had ever walked into in their lives, they wouldn't. You're blessed because the risks of psychiatry aren't taught to the young. And boy do I wish I could have been warned before I trusted your pathetic 'science' with my future, my good name, my life, my body, and my brain. You have NO understanding do you... 'the color of your shirt' are you KIDDING me? Repent.

Posted by: Poe at June 10, 2008 10:54 AM

Anna wrote:

The big issue with the the term PTSD is that it appeared so that the disease were treated by psychiatry.
There's no pill that can cure "neurosis" the old and good neurosis.
As far as therapy is concerned it's appalling that in USA it became, on public opinion, deeply tied with psychiatry.
People don't know the difference between what is the work of a psychologist and of a psychiatrist.
To make things more confusing there are therapies EMDR, CBT, AT and others that are letting people down.
Therapy is not an easy thing. There's no miracle pill and there's no miracle therapy.
It's a hard job and if the person is waiting for salvation it's better reading self-help books."

You are exactly right. Therapy is hard work. Medications are easy. Let's also not forget that the VA has a service connected disability system. Being on an antidepressant will help future disability claims. PTSD rarely occurs in the absence of some secondary factor (relationship problems, possible compensation), but there are times when it does occur without these factors. However, I have rarely seen it without those factors present in some degree.

http://thecountryshrink.com

Posted by: thecountryshrink at June 15, 2008 09:59 AM

I didn't say therapy is hard work and medication is easy...

"Being on an antidepressant will help future disability claims. PTSD rarely occurs in the absence of some secondary factor (relationship problems, possible compensation), but there are times when it does occur without these factors. However, I have rarely seen it without those factors present in some degree."

I didn't understand "how being on an antidepressant can help a future disability..."
When you say that PTSD "rarely occurs in the absence of some secondary factor... " you're are giving me the definition of PTSD.

I'm sorry.
I'm not understanding your point.
This is not a sarcasm, please don't get me wrong.
I'm really not understanding.

Do you believe that these soldiers need these pills?
An antidepressant (Zoloft was elected as the right one for PTSD I don't know why), a mood stabilizer and a benzo.
Are you sure this soldiers are depressed?
Will an antidepressant help these people?

One of the most strange discussions I saw on PTSD was approaching Katrina survivors.
It was a discussion whether these people could be diagnosed as having PTSD or not.
The discussion ended when the number of people affected was raised.
Someone said: "-You cannot compare Katrina with the Tsunami. Too few people. They don't have PTSD.

End of discussion.

For me this is the begging.

Just now I've noticed that we are discussing the same subject on two different posts.

There we go again...:(

Posted by: Ana at June 15, 2008 04:01 PM

That article in time certainly opened my eyes to this issue. Glad awareness is spreading.(Visual response: http://www.zegiel.net/?p=449).

Posted by: Daniel Zegiel at September 6, 2008 03:15 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






pic1.jpg

Patient Blogs. Sites.
Doctor Blogs. Sites.
Activists. News.
Social Networking. Forums.
Science. Big Pharma. Ethics.
Current Affairs
Seattle Stuff
Smoking. Stuff.

Info
About Furious Seasons
Email
Other Articles
ZYPREXA Documents
Alt ZYPREXA Documents Source
Blakemore-Brown Transcript

 Subscribe in a reader

Search


Recent Entries
$99 Left
$114 To Go
Winter Fundraiser, $134 To Go, Final Day
Ruth Lilly, Eli Lilly Heiress, Prozac Beneficiary Dies At 94
Winter Fundraiser, Final Day, Less Than $200 To Go
UCLA Psychiatrist Criticizes DSM-5
Winter Fundraiser, Barely $200 To Go
Most Popular Posts Of 2009
Winter Fundraiser, Less Than $300 Left, Let's Wrap It Up
Senate Health Care Bill Contains $1.25 Billion Gift To Sen. Stabenow
Travel Day, Comment Approval May Be Intermittent
Winter Fundraiser, Close But Stalled
Senate Health Care Reform Bill Contains Controversial MOTHERS Act, Abortion Study
Adult ADHD And Sleep Problems
Vic Chesnutt Dead At 45, Possible Suicide
Recent Comments

Daniel Zegiel on Medicating Our Troops

Ana on Medicating Our Troops

thecountryshrink on Medicating Our Troops

Poe on Medicating Our Troops

therapyfirst on Medicating Our Troops

Sally on Medicating Our Troops

Poe on Medicating Our Troops

therapyfirst on Medicating Our Troops

Stephany on Medicating Our Troops

Sally on Medicating Our Troops

Archives
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
Resources
Mental Health America
National Alliance on Mental Illness
Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance
National Institute of Mental Health
McMan Web
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2