May 10, 2008

Slate Responds To "The Infinite Mind"'s Criticism

Jeanne Lenzer and Shannon Brownlee--co-authors of the recent Slate piece criticizing "The Infinite Mind" radio show for, among other things, not revealing its ties to the pharma industry and for not revealing the pharma ties of its host and guests on a recent program defending anti-depressants--has now posted a response to Bill Lichtenstein, the show's producer, in response to Lichtenstein's response to the initial article. That's a whole lot of responding and there's a whole new set of accusations floating around.

A snippet of Lenzer's response:

"Bill Lichtenstein fails to contradict the key points we made in our article; namely that The Infinite Mind series was funded in part by drug company money; that each of the four experts on the show, “Prozac Nation: Revisited” has received drug company funding; that despite enormous controversy about the safety and efficacy of antidepressants, the experts all expressed a singular viewpoint; and finally, listeners were not told about the experts’ financial conflicts of interest."

The rest, which is fairly detailed, can be read here. The original Slate article is here. My thoughts on the article are right here and my take on the show, which aired in March, is here.

Lenzer does offer a completely different account of what Lichtenstein cast as the Slate authors' payback motivation--if that's the right term--for the article. Short story: Lichtenstein claims that Lenzer tried to pitch him a second show on anti-depressants and their problems and that somehow his not going ahead with the program and the subsequent Slate article are connected. That is of course a huge jab at the Slate authors' credibility and journalistic ethics.

Lenzer and Brownlee state:

"Mr Lichtenstein claims that one of us (Lenzer) pitched him a radio show. Quite the opposite. When Lenzer called Mr. Lichtenstein for an interview, after he realized our interest was in the funding of his guests and the absence of those with contrary views from the show, it was he who suggested that we do a show, telling Lenzer that sometimes differing viewpoints are better heard with separate shows (which he used as a defense for why only those experts with pro-antidepressant viewpoints were present on Prozac Nation: Revisited)."

I do think that "The Infinite Mind" should do a second program on anti-depressants and their problems. The sad thing is that this whole dust-up could've been avoided if the show had revealed its various conflicts upfront. The show gets some funding from Eli Lilly and ran a program actively and questionably defending Prozac and other anti-depressants yet didn't reveal that it took money from Lilly nor that the show's host, Fred Goodwin, has also taken money from Lilly.

For what my peon-on-the-Left-Coast's opinion is worth, it seems to me that since Goodwin and his guests, two of them well-published academics, regularly reveal their conflicts of interest in their academic writing for the smallish audience of doctors who read their journal articles, then they should've done the same for the 500,000 or so listeners to the program. The public deserves just as much full disclosure as doctors do. In fact, we deserve more.

We also deserve a public radio show that is willing to take on these matters is a more thorough fashion than the one-sided manner in which "The Infinite Mind" defended anti-depressants.

Posted by Philip Dawdy at May 10, 2008 10:00 AM
StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Digg it reddit
Comments
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






pic1.jpg

Patient Blogs. Sites.
Doctor Blogs. Sites.
Activists. News.
Social Networking. Forums.
Science. Big Pharma. Ethics.
Current Affairs
Seattle Stuff
Smoking. Stuff.

Info
About Furious Seasons
Email
Other Articles
ZYPREXA Documents
Alt ZYPREXA Documents Source
Blakemore-Brown Transcript

 Subscribe in a reader

Recent Entries
Health Care Questions President Obama Should Address
Summer Fundraiser, The End Is Oh So Near
Perspective On Antipsychotics For Kids FDA Panel Recommendation
Sen. Grassley Pops Yet Another Psych Researcher Over Pharma Money
FDA Panel Recommends Approval Of Antipsychotics For Kids Aged 10, Older
Summer Fundraiser, The End Is Near
Man Killed In Seroquel Deal Gone Bad
Study: Late Bedtimes Linked To Teen Depression
Abilify TV Ad All Over The Place
Summer Fundraiser, Darn Close
Credit Where Credit Is Due
Seroquel Gives Man 55-Hour Erection
Summer Fundraiser, Home Stretch
Seroquel As Street Drug Flooding Scotland
Seroquel, Geodon Tied To Death Of 3-Year-Old "Bipolar Child" In Kansas
Recent Comments
Archives
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
Resources
Mental Health America
National Alliance on Mental Illness
Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance
National Institute of Mental Health
McMan Web
Search


Powered by
Movable Type 3.2