May 15, 2006

Pete Earley's Op-Ed Blasts Around The Country

In an earlier post today, I referenced Pete Earley's op-ed from the May 12 Washington Post. It is now being picked up in slightly revised form by papers all over the country. Here's one example. By Google News's count, it has been picked up 181 times. Given how wildly distorted his op-ed was (the mentally-ill are all dangerous and must be forcibly treated, etc.), I hope to get the opportunity to answer him fully in the pages of the WaPost. If I do, it will be interesting to see how many papers pick it up.

I don't question Earley's good intentions in arguing for accessible treatment for the most seriously mentally-ill (an argument I've been advancing in print for two years now), but he's making the classic mistake of assuming that psych meds work all the time and in all places and are great for long-term use. For people like him, the civil liberties of the mentally-ill aren't that important. It's funny how often that argument is advanced by parents of the mentally-ill, who seem to be perfectly fine with the idea of their offspring being turned into zombies. People have got to want treatment for treatment to work. What's more I am still deeply suspicious of some of the statistics he uses. More to come.

Posted by Philip Dawdy at May 15, 2006 12:21 PM
StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Digg it reddit
Comments

This must be a generalized statement re: parents. When I saw my daughter become a zombie on meds I fought to get them adjusted. I supported her wish to go off of meds, and once back on them, she was a leaning shuffling, drooling zombie, I once again spoke up, asked questions, and demanded the med in question be reduced, and the zombie state diminished. She has been the most aggressive on medications. Off the meds, during the 'wash' she was aggressive, but nothing I couldnt deal with, yet she ripped her hair out and screamed to help her. I did. She is probably one of those 1 in thousands cases that no one wants to talk about, no one wants to figure out. Not all parents fall into the categories placed here. I am not a pity party, and I am not asking for help. I want intellectual discussion based on fact. Who walks in the NAMI walk? the survivors? or the survivors? I refuse to walk and be thought of as a pity party by a line that appears to be drawn further into the sand. Come on. We know injustice when we see it. We know what is right and what is wrong. Extreme cases require extreme care. That is the point. Generalizing parents and survivors fuels the division that I thought no one wants in this arena. There is a lot of bullshit out there in the form of written materials, people can take some and leave some. Smart people disregard the crap. I do. I want to know the real story. By real people. Speak up, and stop holding back.

Posted by: Stephany at May 15, 2006 05:21 PM

This study appears to be more reasonable. It notes:

In 2005, a Canadian journal published a review of all relevant past research on risk assessment for violence among people with mental illness. One dominating theme of the review was that violence can be much more accurately predicted by attending to non-mental health variables compared to mental health factors. These variables include age, gender, socioeconomic status, education, and environment. Additionally, a history of violence is a much stronger predictor of future violence than any mental health-related variables.

[...]

As psychiatric hospitals continue to downsize, the growing number of people with mental illness living in the community has raised concerns about public safety. However, when the types of crime committed by people with mental disorders are examined, violence is not at the top. A 2005 study included an inventory of the types of crimes committed by patients with schizophrenia. Of the 23% who had criminal records, two thirds had committed crimes against property, and two thirds had committed traffic law violations. Violent crimes had been committed by less than a quarter of those with criminal records — less than six per cent of the total patient population.

Source: http://www.heretohelp.bc.ca/publications/factsheets/violence.shtml

Posted by: spiritual_recovery at May 16, 2006 12:32 AM

pic1.jpg

Patient Blogs. Sites.
Doctor Blogs. Sites.
Activists. News.
Social Networking. Forums.
Science. Big Pharma. Ethics.
Current Affairs
Seattle Stuff
Smoking. Stuff.

Info
About Furious Seasons
Email
Other Articles
ZYPREXA Documents
Alt ZYPREXA Documents Source
Blakemore-Brown Transcript

 Subscribe in a reader

Recent Entries
Sadness, Depression And Forgetting Human History
Thanks Again
Fall Fundraiser--It's Over
FDA Defines Pediatric Bipolar Disorder, Holds The Depression
Fall Fundraiser--Getting There
The FDA (Finally) Responds (Sort Of) To Questions About Pediatric Bipolar Disorder
NIH Study: New Antipsychotics More Risky For Kids Than Old Antipsychotics
Fall Fundraiser--Forging Ahead
12 Problems With The Sunday Times Magazine Piece On Child Bipolar Disorder
Novelist David Foster Wallace Hangs Self
The New York Times Sunday Magazine On The Bipolar Child
British FDA Report Finds Healthcare Blogs As Influential As Old Media
Fall Fundraiser--Day 10
The AP Finds Even More Pharma Products In America's Water Supply
Fall Fundraiser--Day Nine
Recent Comments

spiritual_recovery on Pete Earley's Op-Ed Blasts Around The Country

Stephany on Pete Earley's Op-Ed Blasts Around The Country

Archives
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
Resources
Mental Health America
National Alliance on Mental Illness
Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance
National Institute of Mental Health
McMan Web
Search


Powered by
Movable Type 3.2